Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the DG-Vitruvio model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
DG-Vitruvio Emerald
DG-Vitruvio keeps the T-series crown and pavilion and resolves the girdle into a band of 96 facets, 153 in all. The pavilion sits at 40.75°, the classic angle, and the stone is 61.9% deep.
Because the main angles are the T73's, its light figures in emerald are the T73's too: Brilliance 78, 22% leakage. What the girdle adds is scintillation. What emerald takes away, here as in every cut, is fire, and some light against the diamond version.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald and with the DG-Vitruvio in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Vitruvio in emerald (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald: ahead on 4, level on 4.
Global74, the comparison 73, difference +1
Brilliance78, the comparison 78, difference 0
Fire40, the comparison 39, difference +1
Scintillation98, the comparison 80, difference +18
Spread100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm84, the comparison 84, difference 0
Tilt78, the comparison 77, difference +1
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Scintillation 98 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald: 18 points higher
Our scintillation score counts the facet plan, and the plan is identical in every stone. 153 facets against the T73's 73 put DG-Vitruvio at the top of the scale: many small flashes as the stone moves.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Fire 40 against 79 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 39 points lower
40 here, 79 for the diamond version. Emerald disperses light less than a third as strongly as diamond, and a finer girdle cannot make up for it.
DG-Vitruvio in emerald · Fire 40
DG-Vitruvio in diamond · Fire 79
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Leakage 22 against 2 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 20 points higher
22% of the light in our census goes through the pavilion, exactly as in the T73, since the main angles are shared. In diamond the same design leaks 2%.
DG-Vitruvio in emerald · Leakage 22
0° · 12% leak
10° · 35% leak
20° · 32% leak
30° · 37% leak
DG-Vitruvio in diamond · Leakage 2
0° · 4% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 9% leak
30° · 15% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Not by steepening: the mains are at 40.75°, already above emerald's guide minimum of 39.4°. DG-M5 Emerald leaks 10%.
Brilliance 78 against 93 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 15 points lower
The extra facets sit at the edge of the stone, where they change the sparkle more than the light. Brilliance stays where the T73 puts it in emerald, well under the diamond version's 93.
DG-Vitruvio in emerald · Brilliance 78
DG-Vitruvio in diamond · Brilliance 93
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Tilt 78 against 93 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 15 points lower
At 20° it keeps 78 of its face-up light; in diamond, 93. The T73 in emerald scores the same within a point, as its shared angles would suggest.
DG-Vitruvio in emerald · Tilt 78
0° · 12% leak
10° · 35% leak
20° · 32% leak
30° · 37% leak
DG-Vitruvio in diamond · Tilt 93
0° · 4% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 9% leak
30° · 15% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
Choose DG-Vitruvio for a round emerald where fine sparkle matters as much as light: it gives the T73's light with far more flashes. The site's cut notes also suggest it for renders and settings that want a smooth outline.