DG-Vitruvio Tanzanite: more facets, more sparkle

Brilliance 91 · Fire 47 · Scintillation 98 · in our census, where the T73 scores 92 · 47 · 80 in tanzanite

How the DG-Vitruvio handles light in tanzanite, measured: brilliance 91, fire 47 and 9% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.

The DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite, face-up Light Return map from our tracer at refractive index 1.685: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks
Light Return map of the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.685. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.

DG-Vitruvio Tanzanite

Tanzanite has a refractive index of 1.685 to 1.707 and a dispersion of 0.019. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 36.4°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 36.4° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.696, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.016, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.685, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite live.

The DG-Vitruvio has 153 facets and a total depth of 61.9% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 40.8°. In tanzanite, the census returns 91 of 100 for brilliance and 47 for fire, against 92 and 47 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Vitruvio in diamond reads 93 and 79.

Is tanzanite good in a DG-Vitruvio? Pros and cons, measured

Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in tanzanite and with the DG-Vitruvio in diamond. A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation, Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within 5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.

All eight scores against the T73

At a glance: the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in tanzanite (dashed): solid white where it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.

Performance wheel: DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite, against the T73 Round Brilliant in tanzanite as an outline. Solid white marks where it reaches further, hatching where it falls short. The scores are listed below.50100Global+1Brilliance−1Fire0Scintillation+18Spread0Symmetry0Shape-norm−1Tilt+1

Against the T73 Round Brilliant in tanzanite: ahead on 3, level on 3, behind on 2.

  • Global81, the comparison 80, difference +1
  • Brilliance91, the comparison 92, difference −1
  • Fire47, the comparison 47, difference 0
  • Scintillation98, the comparison 80, difference +18
  • Spread100, the comparison 100, difference 0
  • Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
  • Shape-norm98, the comparison 99, difference −1
  • Tilt74, the comparison 73, difference +1
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.

What the DG-Vitruvio gains in tanzanite

More facets, more sparkle

Scintillation 98 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in tanzanite: 18 points higher

Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The DG-Vitruvio has 153 facets and the T73 73, so 98 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.

DG-Vitruvio · 153 facets · Scintillation 98

T73 Round Brilliant · 73 facets · Scintillation 80

Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.

Try it yourself: Compare the Scintillation spoke in the Cut Performance Wheel

Lighter than the same cut in diamond

0.97 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.02 ct for the same cut in diamond (−5%)

Weight follows specific gravity: 3.35 for tanzanite against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 0.97 ct here and 1.02 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.

Tanzanite0.97 ctDiamond1.02 ct
A DG-Vitruvio 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.

Try it yourself: Weights in every gemstone on the DG-Vitruvio page

What the DG-Vitruvio gives up in tanzanite

Less fire in tanzanite than in diamond

Fire 47 against 79 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 32 points lower

Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.016 in tanzanite) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The DG-Vitruvio reads 47 against 79 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders tanzanite's fire live.

The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite under the sunny-day lighting.

What helps: the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 79 for fire in tanzanite, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator

Loses more light when tilted than in diamond

Tilt 74 against 93 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 19 points lower

Tilt is how much of its face-up brilliance a stone keeps when the census tilts it 20° about its long axis, with 2,200 rays. The DG-Vitruvio keeps 74 against 93 for the same cut in diamond. The tilt strips below show the maps at 0°, 10°, 20° and 30°, with each picture's own leak share under it.

DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite · Tilt 74

Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 11% of the face leaking0° · 11% leak
Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 20% of the face leaking10° · 20% leak
Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 30% of the face leaking20° · 30% leak
Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 32% of the face leaking30° · 32% leak

DG-Vitruvio in diamond · Tilt 93

Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 4% of the face leaking0° · 4% leak
Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 2% of the face leaking10° · 2% leak
Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 9% of the face leaking20° · 9% leak
Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 15% of the face leaking30° · 15% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.

What helps: the DG-Miliano reads 84 for tilt in tanzanite, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: Compare the Tilt spoke in the Cut Performance Wheel

Leaks more in tanzanite than in diamond

Leakage 9 against 2 for the DG-Vitruvio in diamond: 7 points higher

Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Vitruvio leaks 9% in tanzanite against 2% for the same cut in diamond. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.

DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite · Leakage 9

Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 11% of the face leaking0° · 11% leak
Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 20% of the face leaking10° · 20% leak
Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 30% of the face leaking20° · 30% leak
Dg-vitruvio in tanzanite tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 32% of the face leaking30° · 32% leak

DG-Vitruvio in diamond · Leakage 2

Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 4% of the face leaking0° · 4% leak
Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 2% of the face leaking10° · 2% leak
Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 9% of the face leaking20° · 9% leak
Dg-vitruvio in diamond tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 15% of the face leaking30° · 15% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.

What helps: the DG-M5 reads 0% for leakage in tanzanite, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: Tilt it yourself in the simulator's light map

Our verdict on the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite

Pick the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite for this: it has more facets to sparkle with and weighs less than in diamond. The catch: it shows less fire than in diamond, loses more light when tilted than in diamond and leaks more than in diamond.

If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 79 for fire in tanzanite, the best of the cuts we score there.

Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Vitruvio model we traced.

DG-Vitruvio Tanzanite: questions

Is the DG-Vitruvio a good cut for tanzanite?

In our census the DG-Vitruvio returns 91 of 100 for brilliance and 47 for fire in tanzanite, against 92 and 47 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 2 pros and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.

What pavilion angle does tanzanite need?

At least 36.4° for a round design: tanzanite's critical angle is 36.4°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Vitruvio's pavilion mains sit at 40.8°.

How much does a DG-Vitruvio weigh in tanzanite?

At 6.5 mm across, 0.97 ct in tanzanite, against 1.02 ct for the same cut in diamond (-5%): tanzanite's specific gravity is 3.35, diamond's 3.52.

Can I see the DG-Vitruvio in tanzanite in 3D?

Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with tanzanite's own refractive index and dispersion. Tanzanite is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.

Get the DG-Vitruvio Cut files

6 formatsMillimetersWatertight

DG-Vitruvio Cut 3D files

The DG-Vitruvio Cut as exact geometry: 265 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD, rendering, printing and casting.

  • STEPExact faceted solid for CAD
  • 3DMRhino, closed mesh on its own layer
  • STLWatertight mesh for printing and casting
  • OBJMesh for modeling and rendering
  • FBXBlender, 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, Unity, Unreal
  • GLBWeb, AR and quick previews
GemCad96 index

DG-Vitruvio Cut cutting files

The DG-Vitruvio Cut as a faceting design: 57 + 96 girdles = 153 facets, 96 index, 8-fold mirror-image symmetry, ready for the machine.

  • .ascGemCad design file, 96 index gear
  • .csvTier table: angles, indices and cutting order
  • DiagramPrintable faceting diagram

Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).

Questions before you buy? Email us.

More gemstones and cuts

Tanzanite: optical properties and the top ten cuts · The DG-Vitruvio: specifications, model and files

Other cuts in tanzanite

The DG-Vitruvio in other gemstones