DG-Anteros Emerald: lighter in weight than diamond, and second only to DG-M5 for light here
Brilliance 86 · Fire 52 · Scintillation 80 · in our census, where the T73 scores 78 · 39 · 80 in emerald
Re-solved for moissanite, DG-Anteros still suits emerald better than the T73 does. Its listed cons come from the diamond version, which does better again.
Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the DG-Anteros model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
DG-Anteros Emerald
DG-Anteros keeps the T73's 73-facet plan and its 53% table, and changes the crown and pavilion: here a 33.0° crown over a 40.1° pavilion, 59.4% deep. Those angles were chosen for moissanite, a stone that bends light far more strongly than emerald.
In emerald it still beats the T73: Brilliance 86 against 78, leakage 14% against 22%. Our rules count each score once, against whichever baseline shows the larger gap, and for this cut that is the same DG-Anteros in diamond. So the gains over the T73 appear here, in the intro, while the list below shows what emerald costs.
Is DG-Anteros a good cut for emerald? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald and with the DG-Anteros in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Anteros in emerald (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald: ahead on 5, level on 2, behind on 1.
Global77, the comparison 73, difference +4
Brilliance86, the comparison 78, difference +8
Fire52, the comparison 39, difference +13
Scintillation80, the comparison 80, difference 0
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm92, the comparison 84, difference +8
Tilt69, the comparison 77, difference −8
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 52 against 74 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 22 points lower
Emerald's dispersion of 0.014 is under a third of diamond's, so most of the colour DG-Anteros throws in diamond is missing here. Against the T73 in emerald it actually scores higher, 52 against 39: the larger gap, with diamond, is the one we list.
DG-Anteros in emerald · Fire 52
DG-Anteros in diamond · Fire 74
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Tilt 69 against 85 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 16 points lower
Tipped 20°, it keeps 69 of its face-up light, where the diamond version keeps 85 and the T73 in emerald 77. A 40.1° pavilion sits under a degree above emerald's 39.4° guide minimum, which leaves little room once light comes in at a slant.
DG-Anteros in emerald · Tilt 69
0° · 5% leak
10° · 20% leak
20° · 34% leak
30° · 41% leak
DG-Anteros in diamond · Tilt 85
0° · 2% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 12% leak
30° · 26% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: The T73 Round Brilliant Emerald keeps 77 when tipped, at 78 brilliance: a steadier, slightly dimmer stone.
Leakage 14 against 2 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 12 points higher
14% of the light in our census escapes through the pavilion. In diamond, with a critical angle of 24.4° rather than 39.4°, the same facets let out only 2%.
DG-Anteros in emerald · Leakage 14
0° · 5% leak
10° · 20% leak
20° · 34% leak
30° · 41% leak
DG-Anteros in diamond · Leakage 2
0° · 2% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 12% leak
30° · 26% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: The share is set by the angles, not the size of the stone. DG-M5 Emerald leaks 10% in emerald.
Brilliance 86 against 95 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 9 points lower
Brilliance 86 against 95 for DG-Anteros in diamond, yet clearly ahead of the T73 in emerald. Of every cut we measure in emerald, only DG-M5 returns more.
DG-Anteros in emerald · Brilliance 86
DG-Anteros in diamond · Brilliance 95
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: In emerald, DG-M5 Emerald returns 90, the most we measure.
DG-Anteros is a strong second for a round emerald: more light and less leakage than the T73, on the facet plan a cutter already knows from it. Only the angles change.
Yes, for a round: Brilliance 86 against 78 for the T73 in emerald, second only to DG-M5 (90).
Why does DG-Anteros list so few pros in emerald?
We list every score once, on the side where its gap is widest. Its gains over the T73 in emerald are smaller than its losses against the same cut in diamond, so brilliance and leakage appear as cons.
DG-Anteros or DG-M5 for an emerald?
DG-M5 returns more light (90 against 86) and leaks less (10% against 14%); DG-Anteros has a little more fire (52 against 46) and the familiar 73-facet plan.
Get the DG-Anteros Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
DG-Anteros Cut 3D files
The DG-Anteros Cut as exact geometry: 73 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.