Brilliance 89 · Fire 74 · Scintillation 80 · in our census, where the T73 scores 98 · 76 · 80 in GGG
How the DG-Anteros handles light in GGG, measured: brilliance 89, fire 74 and 10% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
GGG has a refractive index of 1.970 and a dispersion of 0.045. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 30.5°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 37.4° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.970, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.039, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.970, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Anteros in GGG live.
The DG-Anteros has 73 facets, a table of 53.5% of its width and a total depth of 59.4% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 40.1°. In GGG, the census returns 89 of 100 for brilliance and 74 for fire, against 98 and 76 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Anteros in diamond reads 95 and 74.
No figure ahead by our thresholds
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in GGG and with the DG-Anteros in diamond. A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation, Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within 5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
At a glance: the DG-Anteros in GGG (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in GGG (dashed): solid white where it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in ggg: ahead on 2, level on 2, behind on 4.
Against the T73 in GGG and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the DG-Anteros is ahead by the thresholds above. Its figures are in the wheel and the FAQ; GGG ranks every cut we score in GGG.
1.94 ct at 6.5 mm, against 0.97 ct for the same cut in diamond (+100%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 7.05 for GGG against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.94 ct here and 0.97 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
Try it yourself: Weights in every gemstone on the DG-Anteros page
Brilliance 89 against 98 for the T73 Round Brilliant in GGG: 9 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In GGG, whose critical angle is 30.5°, the DG-Anteros returns 89 of 100 and the T73 98. The DG-Anteros's pavilion mains sit at 40.1°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
DG-Anteros in GGG · Brilliance 89
T73 Round Brilliant in GGG · Brilliance 98
What helps: the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 98 for brilliance in GGG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Try it yourself: Open this Light Return map in the simulator
Leakage 10 against 2 for the T73 Round Brilliant in GGG: 8 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Anteros leaks 10% in GGG against 2% for the T73 in GGG. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
DG-Anteros in GGG · Leakage 10
T73 Round Brilliant in GGG · Leakage 2
What helps: the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 2% for leakage in GGG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Try it yourself: Tilt it yourself in the simulator's light map
Against the T73 in GGG and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the DG-Anteros is ahead by our thresholds. The catch: it weighs more than in diamond, returns less light than the T73 and leaks more light than the T73.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 98 for brilliance in GGG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Anteros model we traced.
In our census the DG-Anteros returns 89 of 100 for brilliance and 74 for fire in GGG, against 98 and 76 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 0 pros and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
At least 37.4° for a round design: GGG's critical angle is 30.5°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Anteros's pavilion mains sit at 40.1°.
At 6.5 mm across, 1.94 ct in GGG, against 0.97 ct for the same cut in diamond (+100%): GGG's specific gravity is 7.05, diamond's 3.52.
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with GGG's own refractive index and dispersion. GGG is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
The DG-Anteros Cut as exact geometry: 73 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD, rendering, printing and casting.
The DG-Anteros Cut as a faceting design: 57 + 16 girdles = 73 facets, 96 index, 8-fold mirror-image symmetry, ready for the machine.
Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).
Questions before you buy? Email us.
GGG: optical properties and the top ten cuts · The DG-Anteros: specifications, model and files