DG-Anteros Pyrope: returns more light than the T73 in pyrope

Brilliance 97 · Fire 57 · Scintillation 80 · in our census, where the T73 scores 94 · 50 · 80 in pyrope

How the DG-Anteros handles light in pyrope, measured: brilliance 97, fire 57 and 2% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.

The DG-Anteros in pyrope, face-up Light Return map from our tracer at refractive index 1.73: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks
Light Return map of the DG-Anteros in pyrope, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.73. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.

DG-Anteros Pyrope

Pyrope has a refractive index of 1.730 to 1.766 and a dispersion of 0.022. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 35.3°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 36.2° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.748, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.019, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.730, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Anteros in pyrope live.

The DG-Anteros has 73 facets, a table of 53.5% of its width and a total depth of 59.4% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 40.1°. In pyrope, the census returns 97 of 100 for brilliance and 57 for fire, against 94 and 50 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Anteros in diamond reads 95 and 74.

Is pyrope good in a DG-Anteros? Pros and cons, measured

Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope and with the DG-Anteros in diamond. A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation, Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within 5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.

All eight scores against the T73

At a glance: the DG-Anteros in pyrope (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope (dashed): solid white where it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.

Performance wheel: DG-Anteros in pyrope, against the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope as an outline. Solid white marks where it reaches further, hatching where it falls short. The scores are listed below.50100Global+3Brilliance+3Fire+7Scintillation0Spread+1Symmetry0Shape-norm+3Tilt+1

Against the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope: ahead on 6, level on 2.

  • Global84, the comparison 81, difference +3
  • Brilliance97, the comparison 94, difference +3
  • Fire57, the comparison 50, difference +7
  • Scintillation80, the comparison 80, difference 0
  • Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
  • Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
  • Shape-norm105, the comparison 102, difference +3
  • Tilt76, the comparison 75, difference +1
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.

What the DG-Anteros gains in pyrope

Returns more light than the T73 in pyrope

Brilliance 97 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope: 3 points higher

Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In pyrope, whose critical angle is 35.3°, the DG-Anteros returns 97 of 100 and the T73 94. The DG-Anteros's pavilion mains sit at 40.1°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.

Dg-anteros in pyrope face-up Light Return map: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks (Brilliance 97)

DG-Anteros in pyrope · Brilliance 97

T73 round brilliant in pyrope face-up Light Return map: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks (Brilliance 94)

T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope · Brilliance 94

Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.

Try it yourself: Open this Light Return map in the simulator

Leaks less light than the T73 in pyrope

Leakage 2 against 5 for the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope: 3 points lower

Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Anteros leaks 2% in pyrope against 5% for the T73 in pyrope. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.

DG-Anteros in pyrope · Leakage 2

Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 0% of the face leaking0° · 0% leak
Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 5% of the face leaking10° · 5% leak
Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 23% of the face leaking20° · 23% leak
Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 32% of the face leaking30° · 32% leak

T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope · Leakage 5

T73 round brilliant in pyrope tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 0% of the face leaking0° · 0% leak
T73 round brilliant in pyrope tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 14% of the face leaking10° · 14% leak
T73 round brilliant in pyrope tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 28% of the face leaking20° · 28% leak
T73 round brilliant in pyrope tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 31% of the face leaking30° · 31% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.

Try it yourself: Tilt it yourself in the simulator's light map

What the DG-Anteros gives up in pyrope

Less fire in pyrope than in diamond

Fire 57 against 74 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 17 points lower

Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.019 in pyrope) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The DG-Anteros reads 57 against 74 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders pyrope's fire live.

The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the DG-Anteros in pyrope under the sunny-day lighting.

What helps: the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 85 for fire in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator

Loses more light when tilted than in diamond

Tilt 76 against 85 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 9 points lower

Tilt is how much of its face-up brilliance a stone keeps when the census tilts it 20° about its long axis, with 2,200 rays. The DG-Anteros keeps 76 against 85 for the same cut in diamond. The tilt strips below show the maps at 0°, 10°, 20° and 30°, with each picture's own leak share under it.

DG-Anteros in pyrope · Tilt 76

Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 0% of the face leaking0° · 0% leak
Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 5% of the face leaking10° · 5% leak
Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 23% of the face leaking20° · 23% leak
Dg-anteros in pyrope tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 32% of the face leaking30° · 32% leak

DG-Anteros in diamond · Tilt 85

Dg-anteros in diamond tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 2% of the face leaking0° · 2% leak
Dg-anteros in diamond tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 4% of the face leaking10° · 4% leak
Dg-anteros in diamond tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 12% of the face leaking20° · 12% leak
Dg-anteros in diamond tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 26% of the face leaking30° · 26% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.

What helps: the DG-Miliano reads 83 for tilt in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: Compare the Tilt spoke in the Cut Performance Wheel

Heavier than the same cut in diamond

1.04 ct at 6.5 mm, against 0.97 ct for the same cut in diamond (+7%)

Weight follows specific gravity: 3.76 for pyrope against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.04 ct here and 0.97 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.

Pyrope1.04 ctDiamond0.97 ct
A DG-Anteros 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.

Try it yourself: Weights in every gemstone on the DG-Anteros page

Our verdict on the DG-Anteros in pyrope

Pick the DG-Anteros in pyrope for this: it returns more light than the T73 and leaks less light than the T73. The catch: it shows less fire than in diamond, loses more light when tilted than in diamond and weighs more than in diamond.

If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 85 for fire in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.

Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Anteros model we traced.

DG-Anteros Pyrope: questions

Is the DG-Anteros a good cut for pyrope?

In our census the DG-Anteros returns 97 of 100 for brilliance and 57 for fire in pyrope, against 94 and 50 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 2 pros and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.

What pavilion angle does pyrope need?

At least 36.2° for a round design: pyrope's critical angle is 35.3°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Anteros's pavilion mains sit at 40.1°.

How much does a DG-Anteros weigh in pyrope?

At 6.5 mm across, 1.04 ct in pyrope, against 0.97 ct for the same cut in diamond (+7%): pyrope's specific gravity is 3.76, diamond's 3.52.

Can I see the DG-Anteros in pyrope in 3D?

Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with pyrope's own refractive index and dispersion. Pyrope is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.

Get the DG-Anteros Cut files

6 formatsMillimetersWatertight

DG-Anteros Cut 3D files

The DG-Anteros Cut as exact geometry: 73 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD, rendering, printing and casting.

  • STEPExact faceted solid for CAD
  • 3DMRhino, closed mesh on its own layer
  • STLWatertight mesh for printing and casting
  • OBJMesh for modeling and rendering
  • FBXBlender, 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, Unity, Unreal
  • GLBWeb, AR and quick previews
GemCad96 index

DG-Anteros Cut cutting files

The DG-Anteros Cut as a faceting design: 57 + 16 girdles = 73 facets, 96 index, 8-fold mirror-image symmetry, ready for the machine.

  • .ascGemCad design file, 96 index gear
  • .csvTier table: angles, indices and cutting order
  • DiagramPrintable faceting diagram

Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).

Questions before you buy? Email us.

More gemstones and cuts

Pyrope: optical properties and the top ten cuts · The DG-Anteros: specifications, model and files

Other cuts in pyrope

The DG-Anteros in other gemstones