Brilliance 89 · Fire 70 · Scintillation 80 · in our census, where the T73 scores 98 · 69 · 80 in zircon
How the DG-Anteros handles light in zircon, measured: brilliance 89, fire 70 and 11% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the DG-Anteros in zircon, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.925. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
DG-Anteros Zircon
Zircon has a refractive index of 1.925 to 1.984 and a dispersion of 0.039. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 31.3°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 37.2° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.955, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.034, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.925, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Anteros in zircon live. Zircon is strongly doubly refractive (birefringence up to 0.059), so its back facets can look doubled. Our census traces one index (1.955), so the doubling is not in these figures.
The DG-Anteros has 73 facets, a table of 53.5% of its width and a total depth of 59.4% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 40.1°. In zircon, the census returns 89 of 100 for brilliance and 70 for fire, against 98 and 69 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Anteros in diamond reads 95 and 74.
Is zircon good in a DG-Anteros? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon and with the DG-Anteros in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Anteros in zircon (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: ahead on 3, level on 2, behind on 3.
Global86, the comparison 88, difference −2
Brilliance89, the comparison 98, difference −9
Fire70, the comparison 69, difference +1
Scintillation80, the comparison 80, difference 0
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm96, the comparison 105, difference −9
Tilt94, the comparison 82, difference +12
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the DG-Anteros gains in zircon
Against the T73 in zircon and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the DG-Anteros is ahead by the thresholds above. Its figures are in the wheel and the FAQ; Zircon ranks every cut we score in zircon.
What the DG-Anteros gives up in zircon
Heavier than the same cut in diamond
1.28 ct at 6.5 mm, against 0.97 ct for the same cut in diamond (+33%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 4.665 for zircon against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.28 ct here and 0.97 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A DG-Anteros 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Brilliance 89 against 98 for the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: 9 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In zircon, whose critical angle is 31.3°, the DG-Anteros returns 89 of 100 and the T73 98. The DG-Anteros's pavilion mains sit at 40.1°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
DG-Anteros in zircon · Brilliance 89
T73 Round Brilliant in zircon · Brilliance 98
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Leakage 11 against 2 for the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: 9 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Anteros leaks 11% in zircon against 2% for the T73 in zircon. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
DG-Anteros in zircon · Leakage 11
0° · 12% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 15% leak
30° · 27% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in zircon · Leakage 2
0° · 1% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 15% leak
30° · 26% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
Fire 70 against 74 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 4 points lower
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.034 in zircon) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The DG-Anteros reads 70 against 74 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders zircon's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the DG-Anteros in zircon under the sunny-day lighting.
What helps:the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 93 for fire in zircon, the best of the cuts we score there.
Against the T73 in zircon and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the DG-Anteros is ahead by our thresholds. The catch: it weighs more than in diamond, returns less light than the T73, leaks more light than the T73 and shows less fire than in diamond.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 98 for brilliance in zircon, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Anteros model we traced.
DG-Anteros Zircon: questions
Is the DG-Anteros a good cut for zircon?
In our census the DG-Anteros returns 89 of 100 for brilliance and 70 for fire in zircon, against 98 and 69 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 0 pros and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does zircon need?
At least 37.2° for a round design: zircon's critical angle is 31.3°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Anteros's pavilion mains sit at 40.1°.
How much does a DG-Anteros weigh in zircon?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.28 ct in zircon, against 0.97 ct for the same cut in diamond (+33%): zircon's specific gravity is 4.665, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the DG-Anteros in zircon in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with zircon's own refractive index and dispersion. Zircon is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the DG-Anteros Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
DG-Anteros Cut 3D files
The DG-Anteros Cut as exact geometry: 73 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.