Mazarin Cut Zircon: more fire in zircon than in diamond

Brilliance 62 · Fire 70 · Scintillation 61 · in our census, where the T73 scores 98 · 69 · 80 in zircon

How the Mazarin Cut handles light in zircon, measured: brilliance 62, fire 70 and 27% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.

The Mazarin Cut in zircon, face-up Light Return map from our tracer at refractive index 1.925: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks
Light Return map of the Mazarin Cut in zircon, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.925. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.

Mazarin Cut Zircon

Zircon has a refractive index of 1.925 to 1.984 and a dispersion of 0.039. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 31.3°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 37.2° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.955, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.034, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.925, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the Mazarin Cut in zircon live. Zircon is strongly doubly refractive (birefringence up to 0.059), so its back facets can look doubled. Our census traces one index (1.955), so the doubling is not in these figures.

The Mazarin Cut has 42 facets, a table of 57.5% of its width and a total depth of 68.8% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 44.3°. In zircon, the census returns 62 of 100 for brilliance and 70 for fire, against 98 and 69 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same Mazarin Cut in diamond reads 65 and 63.

Is zircon good in a Mazarin? Pros and cons, measured

Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon and with the Mazarin Cut in diamond. A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation, Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within 5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.

All eight scores against the T73

At a glance: the Mazarin Cut in zircon (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon (dashed): solid white where it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.

Performance wheel: Mazarin Cut in zircon, against the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon as an outline. Solid white marks where it reaches further, hatching where it falls short. The scores are listed below.50100Global−14Brilliance−36Fire+1Scintillation−19Spread−4Symmetry0Shape-norm−38Tilt+18

Against the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: ahead on 2, level on 1, behind on 5.

  • Global74, the comparison 88, difference −14
  • Brilliance62, the comparison 98, difference −36
  • Fire70, the comparison 69, difference +1
  • Scintillation61, the comparison 80, difference −19
  • Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
  • Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
  • Shape-norm67, the comparison 105, difference −38
  • Tilt100, the comparison 82, difference +18
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.

What the Mazarin Cut gains in zircon

More fire in zircon than in diamond

Fire 70 against 63 for the Mazarin Cut in diamond: 7 points higher

Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.034 in zircon) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The Mazarin Cut reads 70 against 63 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders zircon's fire live.

The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the Mazarin Cut in zircon under the sunny-day lighting.

Try it yourself: See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator

What the Mazarin Cut gives up in zircon

Returns less light than the T73 in zircon

Brilliance 62 against 98 for the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: 36 points lower

Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In zircon, whose critical angle is 31.3°, the Mazarin Cut returns 62 of 100 and the T73 98. The Mazarin Cut's pavilion mains sit at 44.3°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.

Mazarin cut in zircon face-up Light Return map: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks (Brilliance 62)

Mazarin Cut in zircon · Brilliance 62

T73 round brilliant in zircon face-up Light Return map: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, gray shows where it leaks (Brilliance 98)

T73 Round Brilliant in zircon · Brilliance 98

Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.

What helps: the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 98 for brilliance in zircon, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: Open this Light Return map in the simulator

Heavier than the same cut in diamond

1.75 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (+33%)

Weight follows specific gravity: 4.665 for zircon against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.75 ct here and 1.32 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.

Zircon1.75 ctDiamond1.32 ct
A Mazarin Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.

Try it yourself: Weights in every gemstone on the Mazarin Cut page

Leaks more light than the T73 in zircon

Leakage 27 against 2 for the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: 25 points higher

Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The Mazarin Cut leaks 27% in zircon against 2% for the T73 in zircon. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.

Mazarin Cut in zircon · Leakage 27

Mazarin cut in zircon tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 27% of the face leaking0° · 27% leak
Mazarin cut in zircon tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 22% of the face leaking10° · 22% leak
Mazarin cut in zircon tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 28% of the face leaking20° · 28% leak
Mazarin cut in zircon tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 33% of the face leaking30° · 33% leak

T73 Round Brilliant in zircon · Leakage 2

T73 round brilliant in zircon tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 1% of the face leaking0° · 1% leak
T73 round brilliant in zircon tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 6% of the face leaking10° · 6% leak
T73 round brilliant in zircon tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 15% of the face leaking20° · 15% leak
T73 round brilliant in zircon tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 26% of the face leaking30° · 26% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.

What helps: the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 2% for leakage in zircon, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: Tilt it yourself in the simulator's light map

Fewer facets, less sparkle

Scintillation 61 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in zircon: 19 points lower

Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The Mazarin Cut has 42 facets and the T73 73, so 61 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.

Mazarin Cut · 42 facets · Scintillation 61

T73 Round Brilliant · 73 facets · Scintillation 80

Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.

What helps: the DG-Miliano reads 98 for scintillation in zircon, the best of the cuts we score there.

Try it yourself: Compare the Scintillation spoke in the Cut Performance Wheel

Our verdict on the Mazarin Cut in zircon

Pick the Mazarin Cut in zircon for this: it shows more fire than in diamond. The catch: it returns less light than the T73, weighs more than in diamond, leaks more light than the T73 and has fewer facets to sparkle with.

If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 98 for brilliance in zircon, the best of the cuts we score there.

Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same Mazarin Cut model we traced.

Mazarin Cut Zircon: questions

Is the Mazarin a good cut for zircon?

In our census the Mazarin Cut returns 62 of 100 for brilliance and 70 for fire in zircon, against 98 and 69 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 1 pro and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.

What pavilion angle does zircon need?

At least 37.2° for a round design: zircon's critical angle is 31.3°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The Mazarin Cut's pavilion mains sit at 44.3°.

How much does a Mazarin weigh in zircon?

At 6.5 mm across, 1.75 ct in zircon, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (+33%): zircon's specific gravity is 4.665, diamond's 3.52.

Can I see the Mazarin in zircon in 3D?

Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with zircon's own refractive index and dispersion. Zircon is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.

Get the Mazarin Cut files

6 formatsMillimetersWatertight

Mazarin Cut 3D files

The Mazarin Cut as exact geometry: 42 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD, rendering, printing and casting.

  • STEPExact faceted solid for CAD
  • 3DMRhino, closed mesh on its own layer
  • STLWatertight mesh for printing and casting
  • OBJMesh for modeling and rendering
  • FBXBlender, 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, Unity, Unreal
  • GLBWeb, AR and quick previews
GemCad96 index

Mazarin Cut cutting files

The Mazarin Cut as a faceting design: 34 + 8 girdles = 42 facets, 96 index, 4-fold mirror-image symmetry, ready for the machine.

  • .ascGemCad design file, 96 index gear
  • .csvTier table: angles, indices and cutting order
  • DiagramPrintable faceting diagram

Save with a bundle: the Mazarin Cut 3D and cutting files are also in Historic Cuts Complete, 6 cuts for €29.99 until 1 December, then €39.99 (€101.88 as single files). Buy the bundle.

Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).

Questions before you buy? Email us.

More gemstones and cuts

Zircon: optical properties and the top ten cuts · The Mazarin Cut: specifications, model and files

Other cuts in zircon

The Mazarin Cut in other gemstones