Brilliance 61 · Fire 60 · Scintillation 61 · in our census, where the T73 scores 96 · 54 · 80 in YAG
How the Mazarin Cut handles light in YAG, measured: brilliance 61, fire 60 and 33% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the Mazarin Cut in YAG, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.833. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
Mazarin Cut YAG
YAG has a refractive index of 1.833 and a dispersion of 0.028. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 33.1°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 36.7° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.833, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.024, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.833, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the Mazarin Cut in YAG live.
The Mazarin Cut has 42 facets, a table of 57.5% of its width and a total depth of 68.8% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 44.3°. In YAG, the census returns 61 of 100 for brilliance and 60 for fire, against 96 and 54 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same Mazarin Cut in diamond reads 65 and 63.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG and with the Mazarin Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Mazarin Cut in YAG (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in yag: ahead on 2, level on 1, behind on 5.
Global72, the comparison 83, difference −11
Brilliance61, the comparison 96, difference −35
Fire60, the comparison 54, difference +6
Scintillation61, the comparison 80, difference −19
Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm65, the comparison 103, difference −38
Tilt100, the comparison 78, difference +22
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the Mazarin Cut gains in YAG
More fire than the T73 in YAG
Fire 60 against 54 for the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG: 6 points higher
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.024 in YAG) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The Mazarin Cut reads 60 against 54 for the T73 in YAG. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders YAG's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the Mazarin Cut in YAG under the sunny-day lighting.
Brilliance 61 against 96 for the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG: 35 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In YAG, whose critical angle is 33.1°, the Mazarin Cut returns 61 of 100 and the T73 96. The Mazarin Cut's pavilion mains sit at 44.3°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
Mazarin Cut in YAG · Brilliance 61
T73 Round Brilliant in YAG · Brilliance 96
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 97 for brilliance in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 33 against 4 for the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG: 29 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The Mazarin Cut leaks 33% in YAG against 4% for the T73 in YAG. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
Mazarin Cut in YAG · Leakage 33
0° · 30% leak
10° · 33% leak
20° · 31% leak
30° · 39% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in YAG · Leakage 4
0° · 1% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 19% leak
30° · 29% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 3% for leakage in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
1.71 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (+29%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 4.55 for YAG against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.71 ct here and 1.32 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A Mazarin Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Scintillation 61 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG: 19 points lower
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The Mazarin Cut has 42 facets and the T73 73, so 61 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
What helps:the DG-Miliano reads 98 for scintillation in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Pick the Mazarin Cut in YAG for this: it shows more fire than the T73. The catch: it returns less light than the T73, leaks more light than the T73, weighs more than in diamond and has fewer facets to sparkle with.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-M5 reads 97 for brilliance in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same Mazarin Cut model we traced.
Mazarin Cut YAG: questions
Is the Mazarin a good cut for YAG?
In our census the Mazarin Cut returns 61 of 100 for brilliance and 60 for fire in YAG, against 96 and 54 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 1 pro and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does YAG need?
At least 36.7° for a round design: YAG's critical angle is 33.1°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The Mazarin Cut's pavilion mains sit at 44.3°.
How much does a Mazarin weigh in YAG?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.71 ct in YAG, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (+29%): YAG's specific gravity is 4.55, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the Mazarin in YAG in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with YAG's own refractive index and dispersion. YAG is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the Mazarin Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
Mazarin Cut 3D files
The Mazarin Cut as exact geometry: 42 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
Save with a bundle: the Mazarin Cut 3D and cutting files are also in Historic Cuts Complete, 6 cuts for €29.99 until 1 December, then €39.99 (€101.88 as single files). Buy the bundle.
Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).
