Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Mazarin Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Mazarin Cut Amethyst
The Mazarin, or double cut, puts sixteen facets above the girdle and sixteen below on a cushion outline with an octagonal table. Our model has 42 facets, a 57.5% table, a 31.4° crown and a 44.33° pavilion, and it stands 68.8% deep.
The pavilion is steeper than amethyst's 40.4° guide minimum. Set against the same model in diamond, amethyst leaks more than three times the share of light and keeps under half the fire.
Among the historic cushions we measure in amethyst it returns the most light: 43, against 26 for the Peruzzi and 38 for the Old Mine.
How does amethyst fare in a Mazarin cut? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the Mazarin Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Mazarin Cut in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 1, level on 1, behind on 6.
Global57, the comparison 70, difference −13
Brilliance43, the comparison 72, difference −29
Fire28, the comparison 36, difference −8
Scintillation61, the comparison 80, difference −19
Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm46, the comparison 77, difference −31
Tilt98, the comparison 80, difference +18
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline.
Leakage 56 against 17 for the Mazarin Cut in diamond: 39 points higher
In diamond the Mazarin loses under a fifth of its light through the back; in quartz, more than half. The picture's diamond strip starts at about an eighth grey face-up and stays near a quarter once tipped.
Mazarin Cut in amethyst · Leakage 56
0° · 53% leak
10° · 57% leak
20° · 58% leak
30° · 53% leak
Mazarin Cut in diamond · Leakage 17
0° · 13% leak
10° · 25% leak
20° · 23% leak
30° · 21% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: No steeper Mazarin has been measured, so we promise none. For an historic cut with less leakage, the Old European Cut Amethyst loses 41%.
Fire 28 against 63 for the Mazarin Cut in diamond: 35 points lower
The same broad crown facets score 63 for fire in diamond and 28 in quartz. In amethyst its fire also falls below the T73's.
Mazarin Cut in amethyst · Fire 28
Mazarin Cut in diamond · Fire 63
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
What helps: Among amethyst cuts within ten points of the T73's brilliance, the highest fire comes from DG-Anteros Amethyst, 54.
Brilliance 43 against 72 for the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: 29 points lower
A shallow 31.4° crown over a steep pavilion returns about three fifths of the round's light in quartz.
Mazarin Cut in amethyst · Brilliance 43
T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst · Brilliance 72
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: For a cushion with far more light, the modern Cushion Cut Amethyst returns 69 in amethyst.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
The Mazarin suits period reproductions and anyone studying how the brilliant began. If you want a historic cushion in amethyst, it is the brightest of the three we measure.