Peruzzi Cut Amethyst: a historic cushion, a quarter lighter than diamond at the same size

Brilliance 26 · Fire 13 · Scintillation 81 · in our census, where the T73 scores 72 · 36 · 80 in amethyst

In diamond the Peruzzi is the brightest historic cushion we measure, at 75. In quartz it returns about a third of that light, and nearly three quarters leaks out of the back.

The Peruzzi Cut in amethyst, rendered at an angle in our 3D Gemstone Simulator under studio light
Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Peruzzi Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.

Peruzzi Cut Amethyst

Known as the triple cut, the Peruzzi splits its crown into bezels, stars and upper halves and repeats the scheme under the girdle. Our model has 74 facets with its girdle, a tall 46.0° crown, a steep 46.22° pavilion and 69.1% depth.

Its pavilion is well past amethyst's 40.4° guide minimum. Between the diamond and the amethyst only the stone changes, and the census shows the cost: about a third of the light and under a fifth of the fire survive.

Is a Peruzzi cut a good choice for amethyst? Pros and cons

Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the Peruzzi Cut in diamond. A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation, Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within 5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.

All eight scores against the T73

At a glance: the Peruzzi Cut in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.

Performance wheel: Peruzzi Cut in amethyst, against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst as an outline. Solid white marks where it reaches further, hatching where it falls short. The scores are listed below.50100Global−23Brilliance−46Fire−23Scintillation+1Spread−4Symmetry−15Shape-norm−36Tilt+20

Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 2, behind on 6.

  • Global47, the comparison 70, difference −23
  • Brilliance26, the comparison 72, difference −46
  • Fire13, the comparison 36, difference −23
  • Scintillation81, the comparison 80, difference +1
  • Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
  • Symmetry85, the comparison 100, difference −15
  • Shape-norm41, the comparison 77, difference −36
  • Tilt100, the comparison 80, difference +20
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline.

What amethyst gains in a Peruzzi cut

Lighter than a diamond Peruzzi

0.99 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (−25%)

Specific gravity 2.65 for quartz, 3.52 for diamond. This deep cushion, 69.1% from table to culet, weighs a quarter less in amethyst at the same size.

Amethyst0.99 ctDiamond1.32 ct
A Peruzzi Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.

Try it yourself: Weights in all seven gemstones on the Peruzzi Cut page

The Peruzzi's costs in amethyst

Under a fifth of the diamond's fire

Fire 13 against 68 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 55 points lower

Tall crown facets that throw colour in diamond carry little in quartz, whose dispersion is under a third of diamond's. Only the Portuguese Bird's Nest scores lower for fire in amethyst.

Peruzzi cut in amethyst face-up under a single bright light: a render from our simulator, its coloured flashes are the fire (score 13)

Peruzzi Cut in amethyst · Fire 13

Peruzzi cut in diamond face-up under a single bright light: a render from our simulator, its coloured flashes are the fire (score 68)

Peruzzi Cut in diamond · Fire 68

Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.

What helps: Amethyst cuts within ten points of the T73's brilliance top out at 54 for fire, in DG-Anteros Amethyst.

Try it yourself: See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator

Nearly three quarters of the light leaks

Leakage 73 against 19 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 54 points higher

Only the Old Single and the radiant leak more in amethyst. In the picture, the diamond's strip holds at about a quarter grey in every frame: a steady, modest loss that quartz multiplies.

Peruzzi Cut in amethyst · Leakage 73

Peruzzi cut in amethyst tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 72% of the face leaking0° · 72% leak
Peruzzi cut in amethyst tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 71% of the face leaking10° · 71% leak
Peruzzi cut in amethyst tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 55% of the face leaking20° · 55% leak
Peruzzi cut in amethyst tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 44% of the face leaking30° · 44% leak

Peruzzi Cut in diamond · Leakage 19

Peruzzi cut in diamond tilted 0 degrees: Light Return map, 22% of the face leaking0° · 22% leak
Peruzzi cut in diamond tilted 10 degrees: Light Return map, 22% of the face leaking10° · 22% leak
Peruzzi cut in diamond tilted 20 degrees: Light Return map, 24% of the face leaking20° · 24% leak
Peruzzi cut in diamond tilted 30 degrees: Light Return map, 25% of the face leaking30° · 25% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.

What helps: We have no steeper Peruzzi in our census and promise none. The modern Cushion Cut Amethyst leaks 31% in amethyst.

Try it yourself: Tilt it yourself in the simulator's light map

About a third of the diamond's light

Brilliance 26 against 75 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 49 points lower

Steep facets top and bottom work in diamond, where light that meets the pavilion almost always reflects. In quartz, with its 40.4° critical angle, much of it meets a facet it can pass through.

Peruzzi cut in amethyst face-up Light Return map: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, grey shows where it leaks (Brilliance 26)

Peruzzi Cut in amethyst · Brilliance 26

Peruzzi cut in diamond face-up Light Return map: red, green and blue show where the light returns from, grey shows where it leaks (Brilliance 75)

Peruzzi Cut in diamond · Brilliance 75

Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.

What helps: For a cushion in amethyst, the modern Cushion Cut Amethyst returns 69; among the historic cushions, the Mazarin Cut Amethyst returns 43.

Try it yourself: Open this Light Return map in the simulator

A less regular pavilion than a round

Symmetry 85 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: 15 points lower

Symmetry, as we score it, asks how alike each pavilion facet is to its repeats. The Peruzzi's pavilion mixes facets of different sizes and repeats fewer times around the stone than the T73's.

Peruzzi Cut · 74 facets · Symmetry 85

T73 Round Brilliant · 73 facets · Symmetry 100

Symmetry scores how regular the pavilion facets are within the design. Compare how evenly the facets repeat around each pavilion. Drawn from each cut's own model.

What helps: This is the design, not poor cutting. The Old European Cut Amethyst, also a historic cut, has a regular pavilion: Symmetry 100.

Try it yourself: Compare the Symmetry spoke in the Cut Performance Wheel

Who a Peruzzi amethyst suits

In amethyst the Peruzzi is for collectors and reproduction pieces, where the triple-cut pattern matters more than how much light comes back. Its facet plan scores 81 for sparkle, a point above the T73's 80.

For a historic cushion that keeps more light in quartz, the Mazarin Cut Amethyst; for a bright cushion, the modern Cushion Cut Amethyst. In diamond the same cut returns nearly three times the light: see the Peruzzi Cut Diamond.

Peruzzi Cut Amethyst: questions

Is a Peruzzi cut good for amethyst?

Not for light: Brilliance 26 in our census, against 75 for the same cut in diamond and 72 for the T73 in amethyst. Its sparkle, set by the facet plan, scores 81.

Peruzzi or Old Mine cut amethyst?

The Old Mine returns more light (38 against 26), leaks less (62% against 73%) and has more fire; sparkle is level.

Why does a Peruzzi amethyst leak so much light?

Our census measures 73% leaving through the pavilion, against 19% in diamond. The angles stay the same; quartz's larger critical angle, 40.4°, holds less.

What does a 6.5 mm Peruzzi amethyst weigh?

0.99 ct; the diamond Peruzzi, 1.32 ct.

Get the Peruzzi Cut files

6 formatsMillimetresWatertight

Peruzzi Cut 3D files

The Peruzzi Cut as exact geometry: 74 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD, rendering, printing and casting.

  • STEPExact faceted solid for CAD
  • 3DMRhino, closed mesh on its own layer
  • STLWatertight mesh for printing and casting
  • OBJMesh for modelling and rendering
  • FBXBlender, 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, Unity, Unreal
  • GLBWeb, AR and quick previews
€9.99 · Personal useBuy the 3D files
GemCad96 index

Peruzzi Cut cutting files

The Peruzzi Cut as a faceting design: 58 + 16 girdles = 74 facets, 96 index, 4-fold mirror-image symmetry, ready for the machine.

  • .ascGemCad design file, 96 index gear
  • .csvTier table: angles, indices and cutting order
  • DiagramPrintable faceting diagram
€9.99 · Personal useBuy the cutting files

Questions before you buy? Email us.

More gemstones and cuts

Amethyst: optical properties and the top ten cuts · The Peruzzi Cut: specifications, model and files

Other cuts in amethyst

The Peruzzi Cut in other gemstones