Peruzzi Cut Amethyst: a historic cushion, a quarter lighter than diamond at the same size
Brilliance 26 · Fire 13 · Scintillation 81 · in our census, where the T73 scores 72 · 36 · 80 in amethyst
In diamond the Peruzzi is the brightest historic cushion we measure, at 75. In quartz it returns about a third of that light, and nearly three quarters leaks out of the back.
Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Peruzzi Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Peruzzi Cut Amethyst
Known as the triple cut, the Peruzzi splits its crown into bezels, stars and upper halves and repeats the scheme under the girdle. Our model has 74 facets with its girdle, a tall 46.0° crown, a steep 46.22° pavilion and 69.1% depth.
Its pavilion is well past amethyst's 40.4° guide minimum. Between the diamond and the amethyst only the stone changes, and the census shows the cost: about a third of the light and under a fifth of the fire survive.
Is a Peruzzi cut a good choice for amethyst? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the Peruzzi Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Peruzzi Cut in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 2, behind on 6.
Global47, the comparison 70, difference −23
Brilliance26, the comparison 72, difference −46
Fire13, the comparison 36, difference −23
Scintillation81, the comparison 80, difference +1
Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
Symmetry85, the comparison 100, difference −15
Shape-norm41, the comparison 77, difference −36
Tilt100, the comparison 80, difference +20
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline.
Fire 13 against 68 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 55 points lower
Tall crown facets that throw colour in diamond carry little in quartz, whose dispersion is under a third of diamond's. Only the Portuguese Bird's Nest scores lower for fire in amethyst.
Peruzzi Cut in amethyst · Fire 13
Peruzzi Cut in diamond · Fire 68
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
What helps: Amethyst cuts within ten points of the T73's brilliance top out at 54 for fire, in DG-Anteros Amethyst.
Leakage 73 against 19 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 54 points higher
Only the Old Single and the radiant leak more in amethyst. In the picture, the diamond's strip holds at about a quarter grey in every frame: a steady, modest loss that quartz multiplies.
Peruzzi Cut in amethyst · Leakage 73
0° · 72% leak
10° · 71% leak
20° · 55% leak
30° · 44% leak
Peruzzi Cut in diamond · Leakage 19
0° · 22% leak
10° · 22% leak
20° · 24% leak
30° · 25% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: We have no steeper Peruzzi in our census and promise none. The modern Cushion Cut Amethyst leaks 31% in amethyst.
Brilliance 26 against 75 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 49 points lower
Steep facets top and bottom work in diamond, where light that meets the pavilion almost always reflects. In quartz, with its 40.4° critical angle, much of it meets a facet it can pass through.
Peruzzi Cut in amethyst · Brilliance 26
Peruzzi Cut in diamond · Brilliance 75
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Symmetry 85 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: 15 points lower
Symmetry, as we score it, asks how alike each pavilion facet is to its repeats. The Peruzzi's pavilion mixes facets of different sizes and repeats fewer times around the stone than the T73's.
Peruzzi Cut · 74 facets · Symmetry 85
T73 Round Brilliant · 73 facets · Symmetry 100
Symmetry scores how regular the pavilion facets are within the design. Compare how evenly the facets repeat around each pavilion. Drawn from each cut's own model.
What helps: This is the design, not poor cutting. The Old European Cut Amethyst, also a historic cut, has a regular pavilion: Symmetry 100.
In amethyst the Peruzzi is for collectors and reproduction pieces, where the triple-cut pattern matters more than how much light comes back. Its facet plan scores 81 for sparkle, a point above the T73's 80.
Not for light: Brilliance 26 in our census, against 75 for the same cut in diamond and 72 for the T73 in amethyst. Its sparkle, set by the facet plan, scores 81.
Peruzzi or Old Mine cut amethyst?
The Old Mine returns more light (38 against 26), leaks less (62% against 73%) and has more fire; sparkle is level.
Why does a Peruzzi amethyst leak so much light?
Our census measures 73% leaving through the pavilion, against 19% in diamond. The angles stay the same; quartz's larger critical angle, 40.4°, holds less.
What does a 6.5 mm Peruzzi amethyst weigh?
0.99 ct; the diamond Peruzzi, 1.32 ct.
Get the Peruzzi Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
Peruzzi Cut 3D files
The Peruzzi Cut as exact geometry: 74 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.