Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the DG-Miliano model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
DG-Miliano Amethyst
DG-Miliano puts eight stars, eight crown mains and sixteen upper girdle facets over a 96-facet girdle, and cuts the pavilion in three tiers of sixteen, steepest at the girdle. Our model has 177 facets and quotes a 38.3° pavilion, 60.3% deep.
That 38.3° sits about two degrees under amethyst's guide minimum of 40.4°. Moissanite, with a far smaller critical angle, can work with it; quartz, at about 40.4°, lets 40% of the light out through the pavilion.
It holds what it keeps very steadily when tipped, Tilt 97, but that is a steady share of less light, so it is not a pro here.
Is amethyst a good match for DG-Miliano? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the DG-Miliano in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Miliano in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 3, level on 1, behind on 4.
Global68, the comparison 70, difference −2
Brilliance60, the comparison 72, difference −12
Fire28, the comparison 36, difference −8
Scintillation98, the comparison 80, difference +18
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm65, the comparison 77, difference −12
Tilt97, the comparison 80, difference +17
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Fire 28 against 82 for the DG-Miliano in diamond: 54 points lower
Quartz's low dispersion is one reason; the light the pavilion lets go is another, since leaked light carries no colour to the eye.
DG-Miliano in amethyst · Fire 28
DG-Miliano in diamond · Fire 82
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Leakage 40 against 3 for the DG-Miliano in diamond: 37 points higher
40% of the light in our census escapes through the pavilion, against almost none for the same cut in diamond.
DG-Miliano in amethyst · Leakage 40
0° · 31% leak
10° · 42% leak
20° · 40% leak
30° · 41% leak
DG-Miliano in diamond · Leakage 3
0° · 1% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 7% leak
30° · 16% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: We have not measured a steeper DG-Miliano, so we make no promise for one. DG-M5 Amethyst, also drawn for moissanite, leaks 15% in amethyst.
Brilliance 60 against 95 for the DG-Miliano in diamond: 35 points lower
Of our rounds drawn for moissanite, DG-M5 and DG-Anteros keep most of their light in quartz. DG-Miliano does not: its face returns 60 where the T73 returns 72.
DG-Miliano in amethyst · Brilliance 60
DG-Miliano in diamond · Brilliance 95
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
DG-Miliano in amethyst suits someone who wants the finest sparkle and a face that changes little as the stone moves, and who accepts a darker stone than the T73.
We would not choose it for light. Its pavilion was set for moissanite, and quartz shows the cost. As a cutting project it is also long: three pavilion tiers and a 96-facet girdle.