DG-Miliano Morganite: lighter than the same cut in diamond
Brilliance 68 · Fire 34 · Scintillation 98 · in our census, where the T73 scores 79 · 39 · 80 in morganite
How the DG-Miliano handles light in morganite, measured: brilliance 68, fire 34 and 32% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the DG-Miliano in morganite, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.572. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
DG-Miliano Morganite
Morganite has a refractive index of 1.572 to 1.600 and a dispersion of 0.014. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 39.5°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 39.5° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.586, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.012, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.572, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Miliano in morganite live.
The DG-Miliano has 177 facets and a total depth of 60.3% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 38.3°. In morganite, the census returns 68 of 100 for brilliance and 34 for fire, against 79 and 39 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Miliano in diamond reads 95 and 82.
Is morganite good in a DG-Miliano? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite and with the DG-Miliano in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Miliano in morganite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: ahead on 3, level on 1, behind on 4.
Global71, the comparison 73, difference −2
Brilliance68, the comparison 79, difference −11
Fire34, the comparison 39, difference −5
Scintillation98, the comparison 80, difference +18
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm73, the comparison 85, difference −12
Tilt92, the comparison 77, difference +15
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the DG-Miliano gains in morganite
Lighter than the same cut in diamond
0.84 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.03 ct for the same cut in diamond (−19%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 2.855 for morganite against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 0.84 ct here and 1.03 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A DG-Miliano 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Scintillation 98 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: 18 points higher
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The DG-Miliano has 177 facets and the T73 73, so 98 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Fire 34 against 82 for the DG-Miliano in diamond: 48 points lower
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.012 in morganite) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The DG-Miliano reads 34 against 82 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders morganite's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the DG-Miliano in morganite under the sunny-day lighting.
What helps:the Oval Cut reads 70 for fire in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 32 against 3 for the DG-Miliano in diamond: 29 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Miliano leaks 32% in morganite against 3% for the same cut in diamond. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
DG-Miliano in morganite · Leakage 32
0° · 30% leak
10° · 40% leak
20° · 36% leak
30° · 39% leak
DG-Miliano in diamond · Leakage 3
0° · 1% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 7% leak
30° · 16% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 9% for leakage in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Brilliance 68 against 95 for the DG-Miliano in diamond: 27 points lower
The same cut in diamond returns 95. Morganite bends light less than diamond: its critical angle is 39.5°, diamond's 24.4°, so a pavilion facet has to be steeper before light reflects off it rather than passing out. The DG-Miliano's pavilion returns less of morganite's light than of diamond's, as the two maps show.
DG-Miliano in morganite · Brilliance 68
DG-Miliano in diamond · Brilliance 95
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 91 for brilliance in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Pick the DG-Miliano in morganite for this: it weighs less than in diamond and has more facets to sparkle with. The catch: it shows less fire than in diamond, leaks more than in diamond and returns less light than in diamond.
If that catch matters more to you, the Oval Cut reads 70 for fire in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Miliano model we traced.
DG-Miliano Morganite: questions
Is the DG-Miliano a good cut for morganite?
In our census the DG-Miliano returns 68 of 100 for brilliance and 34 for fire in morganite, against 79 and 39 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 2 pros and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does morganite need?
At least 39.5° for a round design: morganite's critical angle is 39.5°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Miliano's pavilion mains sit at 38.3°.
How much does a DG-Miliano weigh in morganite?
At 6.5 mm across, 0.84 ct in morganite, against 1.03 ct for the same cut in diamond (-19%): morganite's specific gravity is 2.855, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the DG-Miliano in morganite in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with morganite's own refractive index and dispersion. Morganite is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the DG-Miliano Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
DG-Miliano Cut 3D files
The DG-Miliano Cut as exact geometry: 177 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.