Baguette Cut Morganite: more fire than the T73 in morganite
Brilliance 43 · Fire 58 · Scintillation 43 · in our census, where the T73 scores 79 · 39 · 80 in morganite
How the Baguette Cut handles light in morganite, measured: brilliance 43, fire 58 and 49% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the Baguette Cut in morganite, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.572. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
Baguette Cut Morganite
Morganite has a refractive index of 1.572 to 1.600 and a dispersion of 0.014. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 39.5°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 39.5° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.586, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.012, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.572, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the Baguette Cut in morganite live.
The Baguette Cut has 21 facets and a total depth of 66.8% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 32.4°. In morganite, the census returns 43 of 100 for brilliance and 58 for fire, against 79 and 39 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same Baguette Cut in diamond reads 40 and 62.
Is morganite good in a Baguette? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite and with the Baguette Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Baguette Cut in morganite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: ahead on 1, behind on 7.
Global49, the comparison 73, difference −24
Brilliance43, the comparison 79, difference −36
Fire58, the comparison 39, difference +19
Scintillation43, the comparison 80, difference −37
Spread97, the comparison 100, difference −3
Symmetry39, the comparison 100, difference −61
Shape-norm56, the comparison 85, difference −29
Tilt59, the comparison 77, difference −18
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the Baguette Cut gains in morganite
More fire than the T73 in morganite
Fire 58 against 39 for the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: 19 points higher
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.012 in morganite) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The Baguette Cut reads 58 against 39 for the T73 in morganite. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders morganite's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the Baguette Cut in morganite under the sunny-day lighting.
2.95 ct at 6.5 mm, against 3.64 ct for the same cut in diamond (−19%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 2.855 for morganite against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 2.95 ct here and 3.64 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A Baguette Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Face-up size 108 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite (T73 = 100): 8% more face-up area for the same weight
Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, measured from each model (T73 = 100): 108 for the Baguette Cut against 100 for the T73. The same volume spread over a longer or shallower outline shows more face for the weight; it is the same in every stone, because specific gravity scales every cut alike.
Baguette Cut · 8.96 x 4.54 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 108
T73 Round Brilliant · 6.94 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in morganite and are drawn to the same scale in millimeters, from each cut's own model. Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, with the T73 at 100: a deeper stone, or a rounder outline, spreads less area for its weight.
Symmetry 39 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: 61 points lower
Symmetry reads how evenly the pavilion facets of each design family are cut: 100 − 6 × their scatter in degrees. The Baguette Cut reads 39, the T73 100. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Baguette Cut · 21 facets · Symmetry 39
T73 Round Brilliant · 73 facets · Symmetry 100
Symmetry scores how regular the pavilion facets are within the design. Compare how evenly the facets repeat around each pavilion. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Tilt 59 against 100 for the Baguette Cut in diamond: 41 points lower
Tilt is how much of its face-up brilliance a stone keeps when the census tilts it 20° about its long axis, with 2,200 rays. The Baguette Cut keeps 59 against 100 for the same cut in diamond. The tilt strips below show the maps at 0°, 10°, 20° and 30°, with each picture's own leak share under it.
Baguette Cut in morganite · Tilt 59
0° · 36% leak
10° · 56% leak
20° · 65% leak
30° · 74% leak
Baguette Cut in diamond · Tilt 100
0° · 43% leak
10° · 44% leak
20° · 44% leak
30° · 44% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the Square Cut reads 85 for tilt in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Scintillation 43 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: 37 points lower
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The Baguette Cut has 21 facets and the T73 73, so 43 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
What helps:the DG-Miliano reads 98 for scintillation in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Brilliance 43 against 79 for the T73 Round Brilliant in morganite: 36 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In morganite, whose critical angle is 39.5°, the Baguette Cut returns 43 of 100 and the T73 79. The Baguette Cut's pavilion mains sit at 32.4°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
Baguette Cut in morganite · Brilliance 43
T73 Round Brilliant in morganite · Brilliance 79
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 91 for brilliance in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Pick the Baguette Cut in morganite for this: it shows more fire than the T73, weighs less than in diamond and faces up larger for its weight. The catch: it has a less regular pavilion than the T73, loses more light when tilted than in diamond, has fewer facets to sparkle with and returns less light than the T73.
If that catch matters more to you, the Square Cut reads 85 for tilt in morganite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same Baguette Cut model we traced.
Baguette Cut Morganite: questions
Is the Baguette a good cut for morganite?
In our census the Baguette Cut returns 43 of 100 for brilliance and 58 for fire in morganite, against 79 and 39 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 3 pros and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does morganite need?
At least 39.5° for a round design: morganite's critical angle is 39.5°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The Baguette Cut's pavilion mains sit at 32.4°.
How much does a Baguette weigh in morganite?
At 6.5 mm across, 2.95 ct in morganite, against 3.64 ct for the same cut in diamond (-19%): morganite's specific gravity is 2.855, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the Baguette in morganite in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with morganite's own refractive index and dispersion. Morganite is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the Baguette Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
Baguette Cut 3D files
The Baguette Cut as exact geometry: 21 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
Save with a bundle: the Baguette Cut cutting files are also in Faceter's Classics, 10 cuts for €22.49 until 1 December, then €29.99 (€69.90 as single files). Buy the bundle.
Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).
