Brilliance 93 · Fire 84 · Scintillation 98 · in our census, where the T73 scores 97 · 84 · 80 in demantoid
How the DG-Miliano handles light in demantoid, measured: brilliance 93, fire 84 and 7% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the DG-Miliano in demantoid, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.881. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
DG-Miliano Demantoid
Demantoid has a refractive index of 1.881 to 1.888 and a dispersion of 0.057. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 32.1°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 37.0° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.885, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.049, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.881, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Miliano in demantoid live.
The DG-Miliano has 177 facets and a total depth of 60.3% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 38.3°. In demantoid, the census returns 93 of 100 for brilliance and 84 for fire, against 97 and 84 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Miliano in diamond reads 95 and 82.
Is demantoid good in a DG-Miliano? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid and with the DG-Miliano in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Miliano in demantoid (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: ahead on 4, level on 2, behind on 2.
Global91, the comparison 90, difference +1
Brilliance93, the comparison 97, difference −4
Fire84, the comparison 84, difference 0
Scintillation98, the comparison 80, difference +18
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm100, the comparison 104, difference −4
Tilt85, the comparison 79, difference +6
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the DG-Miliano gains in demantoid
More facets, more sparkle
Scintillation 98 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: 18 points higher
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The DG-Miliano has 177 facets and the T73 73, so 98 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Tilt 85 against 79 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: 6 points higher
Tilt is how much of its face-up brilliance a stone keeps when the census tilts it 20° about its long axis, with 2,200 rays. The DG-Miliano keeps 85 against 79 for the T73. The tilt strips below show the maps at 0°, 10°, 20° and 30°, with each picture's own leak share under it.
DG-Miliano in demantoid · Tilt 85
0° · 3% leak
10° · 8% leak
20° · 15% leak
30° · 25% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Tilt 79
0° · 1% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 17% leak
30° · 29% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
1.13 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.03 ct for the same cut in diamond (+9%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 3.85 for demantoid against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.13 ct here and 1.03 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A DG-Miliano 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Brilliance 93 against 97 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: 4 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In demantoid, whose critical angle is 32.1°, the DG-Miliano returns 93 of 100 and the T73 97. The DG-Miliano's pavilion mains sit at 38.3°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
DG-Miliano in demantoid · Brilliance 93
T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Brilliance 97
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Leakage 7 against 3 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: 4 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Miliano leaks 7% in demantoid against 3% for the T73 in demantoid. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
DG-Miliano in demantoid · Leakage 7
0° · 3% leak
10° · 8% leak
20° · 15% leak
30° · 25% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Leakage 3
0° · 1% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 17% leak
30° · 29% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
Pick the DG-Miliano in demantoid for this: it has more facets to sparkle with and keeps its light when tilted. The catch: it weighs more than in diamond, returns less light than the T73 and leaks more light than the T73.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Broken Hearts and Arrows reads 97 for brilliance in demantoid, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Miliano model we traced.
DG-Miliano Demantoid: questions
Is the DG-Miliano a good cut for demantoid?
In our census the DG-Miliano returns 93 of 100 for brilliance and 84 for fire in demantoid, against 97 and 84 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 2 pros and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does demantoid need?
At least 37.0° for a round design: demantoid's critical angle is 32.1°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Miliano's pavilion mains sit at 38.3°.
How much does a DG-Miliano weigh in demantoid?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.13 ct in demantoid, against 1.03 ct for the same cut in diamond (+9%): demantoid's specific gravity is 3.85, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the DG-Miliano in demantoid in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with demantoid's own refractive index and dispersion. Demantoid is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the DG-Miliano Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
DG-Miliano Cut 3D files
The DG-Miliano Cut as exact geometry: 177 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
