T105 Round Brilliant Demantoid: more facets, more sparkle
Brilliance 94 · Fire 82 · Scintillation 90 · in our census, where the T73 scores 97 · 84 · 80 in demantoid
How the T105 Round Brilliant handles light in demantoid, measured: brilliance 94, fire 82 and 6% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.881. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
T105 Round Brilliant Demantoid
Demantoid has a refractive index of 1.881 to 1.888 and a dispersion of 0.057. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 32.1°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 37.0° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.885, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.049, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.881, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid live.
The T105 Round Brilliant has 105 facets and a total depth of 59.3% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 40.8°. In demantoid, the census returns 94 of 100 for brilliance and 82 for fire, against 97 and 84 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same T105 Round Brilliant in diamond reads 95 and 77.
Is demantoid good in a T105? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid and with the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: ahead on 3, level on 2, behind on 3.
Global90, the comparison 90, difference 0
Brilliance94, the comparison 97, difference −3
Fire82, the comparison 84, difference −2
Scintillation90, the comparison 80, difference +10
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm102, the comparison 104, difference −2
Tilt82, the comparison 79, difference +3
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the T105 Round Brilliant gains in demantoid
More facets, more sparkle
Scintillation 90 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: 10 points higher
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The T105 Round Brilliant has 105 facets and the T73 73, so 90 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Face-up size 106 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid (T73 = 100): 6% more face-up area for the same weight
Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, measured from each model (T73 = 100): 106 for the T105 Round Brilliant against 100 for the T73. The same volume spread over a longer or shallower outline shows more face for the weight; it is the same in every stone, because specific gravity scales every cut alike.
T105 Round Brilliant · 6.49 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 106
T73 Round Brilliant · 6.29 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in demantoid and are drawn to the same scale in millimeters, from each cut's own model. Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, with the T73 at 100: a deeper stone, or a rounder outline, spreads less area for its weight.
Fire 82 against 77 for the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond: 5 points higher
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.049 in demantoid) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The T105 Round Brilliant reads 82 against 77 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders demantoid's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid under the sunny-day lighting.
What the T105 Round Brilliant gives up in demantoid
Heavier than the same cut in diamond
1.00 ct at 6.5 mm, against 0.92 ct for the same cut in diamond (+9%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 3.85 for demantoid against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.00 ct here and 0.92 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A T105 Round Brilliant 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Tilt 82 against 87 for the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond: 5 points lower
Tilt is how much of its face-up brilliance a stone keeps when the census tilts it 20° about its long axis, with 2,200 rays. The T105 Round Brilliant keeps 82 against 87 for the same cut in diamond. The tilt strips below show the maps at 0°, 10°, 20° and 30°, with each picture's own leak share under it.
T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Tilt 82
0° · 1% leak
10° · 9% leak
20° · 18% leak
30° · 26% leak
T105 Round Brilliant in diamond · Tilt 87
0° · 2% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 11% leak
30° · 14% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 89 for tilt in demantoid, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 6 against 1 for the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond: 5 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The T105 Round Brilliant leaks 6% in demantoid against 1% for the same cut in diamond. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Leakage 6
0° · 1% leak
10° · 9% leak
20° · 18% leak
30° · 26% leak
T105 Round Brilliant in diamond · Leakage 1
0° · 2% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 11% leak
30° · 14% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
Brilliance 94 against 97 for the T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid: 3 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In demantoid, whose critical angle is 32.1°, the T105 Round Brilliant returns 94 of 100 and the T73 97. The T105 Round Brilliant's pavilion mains sit at 40.8°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Brilliance 94
T73 Round Brilliant in demantoid · Brilliance 97
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Our verdict on the T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid
Pick the T105 Round Brilliant in demantoid for this: it has more facets to sparkle with, faces up larger for its weight and shows more fire than in diamond. The catch: it weighs more than in diamond, loses more light when tilted than in diamond, leaks more than in diamond and returns less light than the T73.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-M5 reads 89 for tilt in demantoid, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same T105 Round Brilliant model we traced.
T105 Round Brilliant Demantoid: questions
Is the T105 a good cut for demantoid?
In our census the T105 Round Brilliant returns 94 of 100 for brilliance and 82 for fire in demantoid, against 97 and 84 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 3 pros and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does demantoid need?
At least 37.0° for a round design: demantoid's critical angle is 32.1°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The T105 Round Brilliant's pavilion mains sit at 40.8°.
How much does a T105 weigh in demantoid?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.00 ct in demantoid, against 0.92 ct for the same cut in diamond (+9%): demantoid's specific gravity is 3.85, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the T105 in demantoid in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with demantoid's own refractive index and dispersion. Demantoid is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the T105 Round Brilliant Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
T105 Round Brilliant Cut 3D files
The T105 Round Brilliant Cut as exact geometry: 105 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
