T105 Round Brilliant Synthetic rutile: more fire in synthetic rutile than in diamond
Brilliance 81 · Fire 92 · Scintillation 90 · in our census, where the T73 scores 81 · 94 · 80 in synthetic rutile
How the T105 Round Brilliant handles light in synthetic rutile, measured: brilliance 81, fire 92 and 9% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 2.616. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
T105 Round Brilliant Synthetic rutile
Synthetic rutile has a refractive index of 2.616 to 2.903 and a dispersion of 0.330. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 22.5°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 39.4° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 2.760, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.284, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 2.616, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile live. Synthetic rutile is strongly doubly refractive (birefringence 0.287): its two rays have critical angles of 22.5° and 20.1°. Our census traces one index, so every figure for it is a rough approximation.
The T105 Round Brilliant has 105 facets and a total depth of 59.3% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 40.8°. In synthetic rutile, the census returns 81 of 100 for brilliance and 92 for fire, against 81 and 94 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same T105 Round Brilliant in diamond reads 95 and 77.
Is synthetic rutile good in a T105? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile and with the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile: ahead on 3, level on 3, behind on 2.
Global89, the comparison 88, difference +1
Brilliance81, the comparison 81, difference 0
Fire92, the comparison 94, difference −2
Scintillation90, the comparison 80, difference +10
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm87, the comparison 87, difference 0
Tilt92, the comparison 94, difference −2
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the T105 Round Brilliant gains in synthetic rutile
More fire in synthetic rutile than in diamond
Fire 92 against 77 for the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond: 15 points higher
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.284 in synthetic rutile) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The T105 Round Brilliant reads 92 against 77 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders synthetic rutile's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile under the sunny-day lighting.
Scintillation 90 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile: 10 points higher
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The T105 Round Brilliant has 105 facets and the T73 73, so 90 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Face-up size 106 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile (T73 = 100): 6% more face-up area for the same weight
Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, measured from each model (T73 = 100): 106 for the T105 Round Brilliant against 100 for the T73. The same volume spread over a longer or shallower outline shows more face for the weight; it is the same in every stone, because specific gravity scales every cut alike.
T105 Round Brilliant · 6.28 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 106
T73 Round Brilliant · 6.08 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in synthetic rutile and are drawn to the same scale in millimeters, from each cut's own model. Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, with the T73 at 100: a deeper stone, or a rounder outline, spreads less area for its weight.
What the T105 Round Brilliant gives up in synthetic rutile
Heavier than the same cut in diamond
1.11 ct at 6.5 mm, against 0.92 ct for the same cut in diamond (+21%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 4.26 for synthetic rutile against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.11 ct here and 0.92 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A T105 Round Brilliant 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Brilliance 81 against 95 for the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond: 14 points lower
The same cut in diamond returns 95. Synthetic rutile bends light less than diamond: its critical angle is 22.5°, diamond's 24.4°, so a pavilion facet has to be steeper before light reflects off it rather than passing out. The T105 Round Brilliant's pavilion returns less of synthetic rutile's light than of diamond's, as the two maps show.
T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile · Brilliance 81
T105 Round Brilliant in diamond · Brilliance 95
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 97 for brilliance in synthetic rutile, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 9 against 1 for the T105 Round Brilliant in diamond: 8 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The T105 Round Brilliant leaks 9% in synthetic rutile against 1% for the same cut in diamond. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile · Leakage 9
0° · 2% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 14% leak
30° · 16% leak
T105 Round Brilliant in diamond · Leakage 1
0° · 2% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 11% leak
30° · 14% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 2% for leakage in synthetic rutile, the best of the cuts we score there.
Our verdict on the T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile
Pick the T105 Round Brilliant in synthetic rutile for this: it shows more fire than in diamond, has more facets to sparkle with and faces up larger for its weight. The catch: it weighs more than in diamond, returns less light than in diamond and leaks more than in diamond.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-M5 reads 97 for brilliance in synthetic rutile, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same T105 Round Brilliant model we traced.
T105 Round Brilliant Synthetic rutile: questions
Is the T105 a good cut for synthetic rutile?
In our census the T105 Round Brilliant returns 81 of 100 for brilliance and 92 for fire in synthetic rutile, against 81 and 94 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 3 pros and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does synthetic rutile need?
At least 39.4° for a round design: synthetic rutile's critical angle is 22.5°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The T105 Round Brilliant's pavilion mains sit at 40.8°.
How much does a T105 weigh in synthetic rutile?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.11 ct in synthetic rutile, against 0.92 ct for the same cut in diamond (+21%): synthetic rutile's specific gravity is 4.26, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the T105 in synthetic rutile in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with synthetic rutile's own refractive index and dispersion. Synthetic rutile is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the T105 Round Brilliant Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
T105 Round Brilliant Cut 3D files
The T105 Round Brilliant Cut as exact geometry: 105 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
