Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the DG-Rafaello model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
DG-Rafaello Amethyst
DG-Rafaello is a twelve-fold round whose pavilion curves in five tiers, each a little shallower than the last, from the girdle to the point. Our model has 145 facets and a quoted 40.0° pavilion, 59.0% deep.
In diamond it is one of our strongest rounds. In amethyst its light drops from 94 to 45, the largest fall of any modern round on our amethyst pages.
The quoted pavilion sits just under amethyst's guide minimum of 40.4°, and the lower tiers are shallower still.
Should amethyst be cut as DG-Rafaello? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the DG-Rafaello in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Rafaello in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 3, level on 1, behind on 4.
Global61, the comparison 70, difference −9
Brilliance45, the comparison 72, difference −27
Fire26, the comparison 36, difference −10
Scintillation96, the comparison 80, difference +16
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm49, the comparison 77, difference −28
Tilt100, the comparison 80, difference +20
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Scintillation 96 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: 16 points higher
Twenty-four crown mains, twelve stars and five pavilion tiers break the face into far more facets than the T73's 73, and our scintillation score follows the facet plan.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Fire 26 against 80 for the DG-Rafaello in diamond: 54 points lower
Quartz's weak dispersion and a pavilion that lets most of the light go leave little to colour: 26, where the diamond version scores 80.
DG-Rafaello in amethyst · Fire 26
DG-Rafaello in diamond · Fire 80
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Leakage 55 against 5 for the DG-Rafaello in diamond: 50 points higher
More than half the light in our census, 55%, goes out through the back; the diamond version loses 5%. Shallow lower tiers suit diamond's small critical angle; quartz needs steeper ones.
DG-Rafaello in amethyst · Leakage 55
0° · 66% leak
10° · 48% leak
20° · 42% leak
30° · 40% leak
DG-Rafaello in diamond · Leakage 5
0° · 4% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 7% leak
30° · 17% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: We have no measurements of a re-angled DG-Rafaello, so we do not promise one. DG-M5 Amethyst, another twelve-fold round, leaks 15% in amethyst.
Brilliance 45 against 94 for the DG-Rafaello in diamond: 49 points lower
Of the rounds on these amethyst pages, only the Old Single returns less.
DG-Rafaello in amethyst · Brilliance 45
DG-Rafaello in diamond · Brilliance 94
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:DG-M5 Amethyst keeps a twelve-fold plan and returns 85 in amethyst.
We would not cut DG-Rafaello in amethyst for light. It is matched to diamond, and in quartz its face returns less than two-thirds of the T73's.
It suits a render or a collection that wants the twelve-fold sparkle in purple, or a cutter comparing one design across materials. Five pavilion tiers on a twelve-fold plan also make it a long project at the machine. Tilt reads 100, the top of the scale, but that is a steady share of little light.
For sparkle only. Its face returns 45 where the T73 in quartz returns 72, and 55% of the light leaks.
Why does DG-Rafaello work in diamond but not in amethyst?
Diamond's critical angle is 24.4°, amethyst's about 40.4°, so pavilion tiers that hold light in diamond let it through in quartz: 55% leaks here, 5% in diamond.
DG-Rafaello or DG-M5 for amethyst?
DG-M5, by a wide margin: Brilliance 85 against 45, leakage 15% against 55%.
Get the DG-Rafaello Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
DG-Rafaello Cut 3D files
The DG-Rafaello Cut as exact geometry: 145 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.