Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Hexagon Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Hexagon Cut Amethyst
Six straight sides frame a crown of steps, and below the girdle the pavilion falls in tiers. Our model has 37 facets, 61.0% depth and a 29.26° pavilion.
That pavilion angle is far under amethyst's 40.4° guide minimum, which is worked out for rounds, yet the census finds it leaking less than the steeper rectangle: 40% against 72%. We report it as measured.
Against the T73 in amethyst it trails on light and sparkle; against the same hexagon in diamond, on fire and leakage.
Is a hexagon cut a good fit for amethyst? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the Hexagon Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Hexagon Cut in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 2, level on 2, behind on 4.
Global62, the comparison 70, difference −8
Brilliance49, the comparison 72, difference −23
Fire39, the comparison 36, difference +3
Scintillation56, the comparison 80, difference −24
Spread100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm64, the comparison 77, difference −13
Tilt100, the comparison 80, difference +20
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline.
0.97 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.29 ct for the same cut in diamond (−25%)
Size for size, quartz weighs 2.65 to diamond's 3.52. A hexagon cut to the same millimetres in amethyst is a quarter lighter, which adds up across a cluster or band of several stones.
A Hexagon Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Fire 39 against 85 for the Hexagon Cut in diamond: 46 points lower
The diamond hexagon scores 85 for fire. In amethyst its tiers reach 39, a few points above the T73's 36, and no more.
Hexagon Cut in amethyst · Fire 39
Hexagon Cut in diamond · Fire 85
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
What helps: Among the cuts within ten points of the T73's brilliance in amethyst, DG-Anteros Amethyst has the highest fire score: 54.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
What helps: The Octagon Cut Amethyst carries the same tier profile with more facets and scores 66.
Brilliance 49 against 72 for the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: 23 points lower
Steps and tiers return light in fewer, larger panels than a round's cone of facets, and less of the face sends it back to the eye.
Hexagon Cut in amethyst · Brilliance 49
T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst · Brilliance 72
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: We have not measured a hexagon at other angles. In eight sides, the Octagon Cut Amethyst returns 64.
Leakage 40 against 24 for the Hexagon Cut in diamond: 16 points higher
In quartz two fifths of the light leaves through the back; in diamond, about a quarter. Quartz's wider critical angle, 40.4°, lets more light through the low pavilion tiers.
Hexagon Cut in amethyst · Leakage 40
0° · 28% leak
10° · 50% leak
20° · 46% leak
30° · 43% leak
Hexagon Cut in diamond · Leakage 24
0° · 30% leak
10° · 25% leak
20° · 22% leak
30° · 23% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Size does not change the leak share. The Octagon Cut Amethyst leaks a little less, 36%; DG-M5 Amethyst, the least we measure in amethyst, 15%.
The hexagon suits geometric amethyst jewelry: clusters, bands and modern pendants where the six-sided outline tiles neatly. It scores 100 for Tilt, measured at 20°, but the face it holds returns about two thirds of the round's light.