Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Hexagon Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Hexagon Cut Moissanite
Ours puts a step-cut crown over a tiered pavilion on six equal sides: 37 facets in all, the pavilion at 29.26°, the depth 61.0%. Hexagons sit edge to edge without gaps, which is why they suit clusters and bands.
Fire is its strength in moissanite: 97, the same as the T73, and only four cuts we measure in moissanite score higher.
The rest of the page is the catch: about two thirds of the round's light, far fewer flashes, more leakage, and a slightly smaller face for its weight.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite and with the Hexagon Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Hexagon Cut in moissanite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: ahead on 1, level on 3, behind on 4.
Global78, the comparison 91, difference −13
Brilliance57, the comparison 86, difference −29
Fire97, the comparison 97, difference 0
Scintillation56, the comparison 80, difference −24
Spread100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm75, the comparison 93, difference −18
Tilt100, the comparison 94, difference +6
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline.
Fire 97 against 85 for the Hexagon Cut in diamond: 12 points higher
Through the hexagon's facets diamond reaches 85 and moissanite 97. The difference is the material, whose refractive index and dispersion both differ from diamond's.
Hexagon Cut in moissanite · Fire 97
Hexagon Cut in diamond · Fire 85
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Brilliance 57 against 86 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 29 points lower
57 against 86, almost the same as the diamond hexagon's 58. Its 29.26° pavilion figure is well below the 39.5° guide minimum for rounds, and we have no measurement of a steeper hexagon.
Hexagon Cut in moissanite · Brilliance 57
T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite · Brilliance 86
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: For more light on a cornered outline, the Square returns 82; for the most light, DG-M5 Moissanite at 98.
Scintillation 56 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 24 points lower
With 37 facets to the T73's 73, the hexagon scores 56 for scintillation where the round scores 80. It comes from the facet pattern, so a hexagon scores the same for scintillation in any stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
What helps: The facet plan sets this. On a stepped, many-sided outline the Octagon scores 66; the Cushion scores 85.
Leakage 26 against 7 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 19 points higher
26% of the light in our census leaves through the pavilion; the T73 loses 7%, the diamond hexagon 24%.
Hexagon Cut in moissanite · Leakage 26
0° · 30% leak
10° · 30% leak
20° · 28% leak
30° · 26% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite · Leakage 7
0° · 10% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 10% leak
30° · 15% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
Face-up size 96 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite (T73 = 100): 4% less face-up area for the same weight
Face-up size is the outline area a model shows per carat, set against the T73 at 100. A hexagon of the same carat weight covers 96: a small gap, but just large enough for us to list it as a con.
Hexagon Cut · 7.10 x 6.15 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 96
T73 Round Brilliant · 6.68 mm at 1.00 ct · Face-up size 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in moissanite and are drawn to the same scale in millimetres, from each cut's own model. Face-up size is the outline's area per carat, with the T73 at 100: a deeper stone, or a rounder outline, spreads less area for its weight.
What helps: Compare stones by millimetres: a hexagon 6.5 mm wide weighs 1.18 ct in moissanite.
The hexagon suits clusters, bands and geometric designs where a clean six-sided outline and strong colour matter more than brilliance. In moissanite its fire is as high as the round's.