Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Square Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Square Cut Moissanite
Our Square is a brilliant with a full facet set on a square outline: 69 facets, 65.0% deep, with a 41.39° pavilion. It works as a centre stone or an accent.
Of the square outlines we measure in moissanite, it returns the most light, 82; the Cushion returns 74 and the Radiant Square 71. Against the T73 it still trails on four scores, all by small margins.
Is a square cut good for moissanite? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite and with the Square Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Square Cut in moissanite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: ahead on 1, level on 1, behind on 6.
Global87, the comparison 91, difference −4
Brilliance82, the comparison 86, difference −4
Fire91, the comparison 97, difference −6
Scintillation78, the comparison 80, difference −2
Spread98, the comparison 100, difference −2
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm108, the comparison 93, difference +15
Tilt88, the comparison 94, difference −6
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 91 against 72 for the Square Cut in diamond: 19 points higher
Through the same square plan diamond scores 72 and moissanite 91. Dispersion is the reason: 0.104 for moissanite, 0.044 for diamond.
Square Cut in moissanite · Fire 91
Square Cut in diamond · Fire 72
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Tilt 88 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 6 points lower
Tipped by 20°, the Square keeps 88 of its face-up light, the T73 94. This is its largest gap to the round.
Square Cut in moissanite · Tilt 88
0° · 10% leak
10° · 14% leak
20° · 17% leak
30° · 24% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite · Tilt 94
0° · 10% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 10% leak
30° · 15% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: No square outline we sell beats it on both tilt and light. The Octagon Cut Moissanite keeps 100 when tipped, but returns 67.
Brilliance 82 against 86 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 4 points lower
82 against 86: close, for a square. Its 41.39° pavilion is steeper than the T73's and above the guide minimum, so steepening is not the fix.
Square Cut in moissanite · Brilliance 82
T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite · Brilliance 86
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: Among square outlines, none we measure does better in moissanite. Only the rounds go higher, up to 98 for DG-M5 Moissanite.
Leakage 11 against 7 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 4 points higher
11% of the light in our census leaves through the pavilion; the T73 loses 7%. A smaller Square would lose the same share.
Square Cut in moissanite · Leakage 11
0° · 10% leak
10° · 14% leak
20° · 17% leak
30° · 24% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite · Leakage 7
0° · 10% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 10% leak
30° · 15% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: At 41.39° the pavilion already clears the 39.5° guide minimum, so a steeper one will not help. DG-Anteros Moissanite leaks 3%.
Spread 98 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 2 points lower
A Square of the same carat weight shows a touch less face than the round, because its deep outline holds more weight below the girdle.
Square Cut · 6.41 mm at 1.00 ct · Spread 98
T73 Round Brilliant · 6.68 mm at 1.00 ct · Spread 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in moissanite and are drawn to the same scale, from each cut's own model. Spread is face-up size per carat: a deeper stone carries more weight below the girdle and looks smaller for its weight.
What helps: Choose by millimetres; a 6.5 mm Square weighs 1.04 ct in moissanite.
For a square moissanite with as much light as the outline allows, this is the cut we would pick from our set. It suits a modern solitaire or a row of accent stones.
Moissanite is doubly refractive, and broad facets can show doubled facet edges. Ours is a brilliant plan, and since the effect is not modelled we cannot score it.
Square Cut Moissanite: questions
Is square cut moissanite bright?
It is the brightest square outline we measure in moissanite, 82, against 86 for the T73 round.
Does square cut moissanite show doubling?
Our renders follow a single refractive index, so they cannot show it. Moissanite's birefringence, 0.043, is real, and cutters usually orient the table to hide it.
What does a 6.5 mm square moissanite weigh?
1.04 ct, against 1.14 ct for a diamond Square of that width.
Get the Square Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
Square Cut 3D files
The Square Cut as exact geometry: 69 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.