Square Cut Iolite: lighter than the same cut in diamond
Brilliance 65 · Fire 60 · Scintillation 78 · in our census, where the T73 scores 72 · 58 · 80 in iolite
How the Square Cut handles light in iolite, measured: brilliance 65, fire 60 and 29% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the Square Cut in iolite, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.542. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
Square Cut Iolite
Iolite has a refractive index of 1.542 to 1.551 and a dispersion of 0.017. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 40.4°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 40.4° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.547, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.015, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.542, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the Square Cut in iolite live.
The Square Cut has 69 facets and a total depth of 65.0% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 41.4°. In iolite, the census returns 65 of 100 for brilliance and 60 for fire, against 72 and 58 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same Square Cut in diamond reads 85 and 72.
Is iolite good in a Square? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in iolite and with the Square Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Square Cut in iolite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in iolite (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in iolite: ahead on 3, level on 1, behind on 4.
Global73, the comparison 74, difference −1
Brilliance65, the comparison 72, difference −7
Fire60, the comparison 58, difference +2
Scintillation78, the comparison 80, difference −2
Spread98, the comparison 100, difference −2
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm86, the comparison 77, difference +9
Tilt84, the comparison 81, difference +3
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the Square Cut gains in iolite
Lighter than the same cut in diamond
0.85 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.14 ct for the same cut in diamond (−26%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 2.61 for iolite against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 0.85 ct here and 1.14 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A Square Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Brilliance 65 against 85 for the Square Cut in diamond: 20 points lower
The same cut in diamond returns 85. Iolite bends light less than diamond: its critical angle is 40.4°, diamond's 24.4°, so a pavilion facet has to be steeper before light reflects off it rather than passing out. The Square Cut's pavilion returns less of iolite's light than of diamond's, as the two maps show.
Square Cut in iolite · Brilliance 65
Square Cut in diamond · Brilliance 85
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 85 for brilliance in iolite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 29 against 10 for the Square Cut in diamond: 19 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The Square Cut leaks 29% in iolite against 10% for the same cut in diamond. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
Square Cut in iolite · Leakage 29
0° · 27% leak
10° · 35% leak
20° · 34% leak
30° · 46% leak
Square Cut in diamond · Leakage 10
0° · 7% leak
10° · 11% leak
20° · 16% leak
30° · 22% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 15% for leakage in iolite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Fire 60 against 72 for the Square Cut in diamond: 12 points lower
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.015 in iolite) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The Square Cut reads 60 against 72 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders iolite's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the Square Cut in iolite under the sunny-day lighting.
What helps:the Oval Cut reads 82 for fire in iolite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Pick the Square Cut in iolite for this: it weighs less than in diamond. The catch: it returns less light than in diamond, leaks more than in diamond and shows less fire than in diamond.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-M5 reads 85 for brilliance in iolite, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same Square Cut model we traced.
Square Cut Iolite: questions
Is the Square a good cut for iolite?
In our census the Square Cut returns 65 of 100 for brilliance and 60 for fire in iolite, against 72 and 58 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 1 pro and 3 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does iolite need?
At least 40.4° for a round design: iolite's critical angle is 40.4°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The Square Cut's pavilion mains sit at 41.4°.
How much does a Square weigh in iolite?
At 6.5 mm across, 0.85 ct in iolite, against 1.14 ct for the same cut in diamond (-26%): iolite's specific gravity is 2.61, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the Square in iolite in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with iolite's own refractive index and dispersion. Iolite is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the Square Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
Square Cut 3D files
The Square Cut as exact geometry: 69 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.