Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Old European Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Old European Cut Moissanite
The Old European is the antique round that nearly matches the T73 in diamond. In moissanite it gains what moissanite always gives, fire, and gives up a little of the light the diamond version keeps.
Our model has 74 facets, a small 45.0% table and a 41.5° pavilion.
Against the T73 in moissanite the gaps are small in both directions: Brilliance 79 against 86, Fire 95 against 97, scintillation level. The pros and cons below come mostly from the comparison with diamond, because that is where the differences are large.
Is moissanite good in an Old European cut? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite and with the Old European Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Old European Cut in moissanite (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: ahead on 3, level on 1, behind on 4.
Global89, the comparison 91, difference −2
Brilliance79, the comparison 86, difference −7
Fire95, the comparison 97, difference −2
Scintillation81, the comparison 80, difference +1
Spread98, the comparison 100, difference −2
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm123, the comparison 93, difference +30
Tilt100, the comparison 94, difference +6
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 95 against 74 for the Old European Cut in diamond: 21 points higher
Moissanite's dispersion is more than twice diamond's. Under the same light, the moissanite render shows larger and brighter flashes of colour across the same facets.
Old European Cut in moissanite · Fire 95
Old European Cut in diamond · Fire 74
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Brilliance 79 against 90 for the Old European Cut in diamond: 11 points lower
The Old European's angles suit diamond; moissanite bends light more strongly, so a little more of it misses the eye. Head-on, the two maps look equally full: the loss shows in the wider cone of light the score averages.
Old European Cut in moissanite · Brilliance 79
Old European Cut in diamond · Brilliance 90
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:DG-Anteros Moissanite is our round re-solved for moissanite: Brilliance 92.
Leakage 9 against 5 for the Old European Cut in diamond: 4 points higher
9% against 5% in diamond. The strip is mixed: face-up both hold their light, at 10° the moissanite shows more grey, at 20° and 30° the two are about level. The census averages light from every direction, and there moissanite comes out a few points behind.
Old European Cut in moissanite · Leakage 9
0° · 1% leak
10° · 13% leak
20° · 9% leak
30° · 15% leak
Old European Cut in diamond · Leakage 5
0° · 3% leak
10° · 7% leak
20° · 10% leak
30° · 17% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Set it face-up; the leak shows as it tilts. DG-Anteros leaks 3%.
Spread 98 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in moissanite: 2 points lower
At 64.7% deep it is slightly narrower than the T73 for the same weight.
Old European Cut · 6.51 mm at 1.00 ct · Spread 98
T73 Round Brilliant · 6.68 mm at 1.00 ct · Spread 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in moissanite and are drawn to the same scale, from each cut's own model. Spread is face-up size per carat: a deeper stone carries more weight below the girdle and looks smaller for its weight.
What helps: The gap is two points: two per cent of the width, about 0.13 mm on a 6.5 mm stone.
The antique round to choose in moissanite: a modern round's sparkle, a little less of its light, and fire close to the top of our scale. It suits a vintage engagement ring that should still look bright. Some find this much colour too much in a high-crowned antique cut; that is taste, not a measure.
Very: 95 in our census, against 74 for the same cut in diamond and 97 for the T73 in moissanite.
Old European cut moissanite or diamond?
Moissanite has more fire (95 against 74); diamond returns more light (90 against 79).
Old European moissanite or DG-Anteros?
DG-Anteros returns more light (92 against 79) and leaks less (3% against 9%); the Old European has a little more fire (95 against 91) and the antique look.
Does Old European moissanite look like an antique diamond?
The facet pattern is the same, the colour is not: it scores 95 for fire where the diamond scores 74, and the renders above show the difference under one light.
Get the Old European Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
Old European Cut 3D files
The Old European Cut as exact geometry: 74 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.