Old European Cut Pyrope: what our light census measures
Brilliance 78 · Fire 48 · Scintillation 81 · in our census, where the T73 scores 94 · 50 · 80 in pyrope
How the Old European Cut handles light in pyrope, measured: brilliance 78, fire 48 and 22% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the Old European Cut in pyrope, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.73. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
Old European Cut Pyrope
Pyrope has a refractive index of 1.730 to 1.766 and a dispersion of 0.022. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 35.3°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 36.2° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.748, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.019, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.730, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the Old European Cut in pyrope live.
The Old European Cut has 74 facets, a table of 45.0% of its width and a total depth of 64.7% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 41.5°. In pyrope, the census returns 78 of 100 for brilliance and 48 for fire, against 94 and 50 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same Old European Cut in diamond reads 90 and 74.
Is pyrope good in an Old European? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope and with the Old European Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Old European Cut in pyrope (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope: ahead on 3, level on 1, behind on 4.
Global76, the comparison 81, difference −5
Brilliance78, the comparison 94, difference −16
Fire48, the comparison 50, difference −2
Scintillation81, the comparison 80, difference +1
Spread98, the comparison 100, difference −2
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm121, the comparison 102, difference +19
Tilt87, the comparison 75, difference +12
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the Old European Cut gains in pyrope
Against the T73 in pyrope and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the Old European Cut is ahead by the thresholds above. Its figures are in the wheel and the FAQ; Pyrope ranks every cut we score in pyrope.
What the Old European Cut gives up in pyrope
Less fire in pyrope than in diamond
Fire 48 against 74 for the Old European Cut in diamond: 26 points lower
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.019 in pyrope) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The Old European Cut reads 48 against 74 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders pyrope's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the Old European Cut in pyrope under the sunny-day lighting.
What helps:the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 85 for fire in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 22 against 5 for the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope: 17 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The Old European Cut leaks 22% in pyrope against 5% for the T73 in pyrope. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
Old European Cut in pyrope · Leakage 22
0° · 22% leak
10° · 17% leak
20° · 34% leak
30° · 36% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope · Leakage 5
0° · 0% leak
10° · 14% leak
20° · 28% leak
30° · 31% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 0% for leakage in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.
Brilliance 78 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope: 16 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In pyrope, whose critical angle is 35.3°, the Old European Cut returns 78 of 100 and the T73 94. The Old European Cut's pavilion mains sit at 41.5°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
Old European Cut in pyrope · Brilliance 78
T73 Round Brilliant in pyrope · Brilliance 94
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 100 for brilliance in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.
1.16 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.09 ct for the same cut in diamond (+7%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 3.76 for pyrope against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.16 ct here and 1.09 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A Old European Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Against the T73 in pyrope and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the Old European Cut is ahead by our thresholds. The catch: it shows less fire than in diamond, leaks more light than the T73, returns less light than the T73 and weighs more than in diamond.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 85 for fire in pyrope, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same Old European Cut model we traced.
Old European Cut Pyrope: questions
Is the Old European a good cut for pyrope?
In our census the Old European Cut returns 78 of 100 for brilliance and 48 for fire in pyrope, against 94 and 50 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 0 pros and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does pyrope need?
At least 36.2° for a round design: pyrope's critical angle is 35.3°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The Old European Cut's pavilion mains sit at 41.5°.
How much does a Old European weigh in pyrope?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.16 ct in pyrope, against 1.09 ct for the same cut in diamond (+7%): pyrope's specific gravity is 3.76, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the Old European in pyrope in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with pyrope's own refractive index and dispersion. Pyrope is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the Old European Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
Old European Cut 3D files
The Old European Cut as exact geometry: 74 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
Save with a bundle: the Old European Cut 3D and cutting files are also in Historic Cuts Complete, 6 cuts for €29.99 until 1 December, then €39.99 (€101.88 as single files). Buy the bundle.
Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).
