Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the DG-Anteros model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
DG-Anteros Amethyst
DG-Anteros keeps the T73's 73 facets and a 53.5% table, with a 33.0° crown and a 40.1° pavilion re-solved for moissanite. In amethyst that pavilion sits a fraction under the guide minimum of 40.4°, yet the stone leaks only 18% of its light, the second-smallest share we measure in quartz.
Each score counts once on these pages, against whichever baseline it differs from more. For DG-Anteros in amethyst that is the diamond version every time, so its wins over the T73 (Brilliance 82 against 72, Fire 54 against 36) appear here rather than among the pros.
Is DG-Anteros a good cut for amethyst? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst and with the DG-Anteros in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Anteros in amethyst (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in amethyst: ahead on 5, level on 2, behind on 1.
Global76, the comparison 70, difference +6
Brilliance82, the comparison 72, difference +10
Fire54, the comparison 36, difference +18
Scintillation80, the comparison 80, difference 0
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm88, the comparison 77, difference +11
Tilt69, the comparison 80, difference −11
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 54 against 74 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 20 points lower
Quartz disperses light weakly, 0.013 to diamond's 0.044. A re-solved crown cannot add colour the material never splits out.
DG-Anteros in amethyst · Fire 54
DG-Anteros in diamond · Fire 74
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
What helps: The Oval Cut Amethyst gives the most fire we measure in amethyst, 69.
Tilt 69 against 85 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 16 points lower
At 20° it holds 69 of its face-up light; the diamond version holds 85. In the diamond's strip the grey grows steadily as the stone tips. Quartz, with its larger critical angle, loses more over the same tilt.
DG-Anteros in amethyst · Tilt 69
0° · 20% leak
10° · 25% leak
20° · 38% leak
30° · 45% leak
DG-Anteros in diamond · Tilt 85
0° · 2% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 12% leak
30° · 26% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: The DG-Vitruvio Amethyst keeps 81 when tipped, from less light to begin with (71).
Leakage 18 against 2 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 16 points higher
18% of the light in our census escapes in amethyst against 2% in diamond. It is still among the smallest shares in this stone; only DG-M5 leaks less.
DG-Anteros in amethyst · Leakage 18
0° · 20% leak
10° · 25% leak
20° · 38% leak
30° · 45% leak
DG-Anteros in diamond · Leakage 2
0° · 2% leak
10° · 4% leak
20° · 12% leak
30° · 26% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: We have not measured a steeper DG-Anteros, so we cannot say what one would do. DG-M5 Amethyst leaks 15%, the least in this stone; size does not change the share.
Brilliance 82 against 95 for the DG-Anteros in diamond: 13 points lower
Diamond returns 95 in this cut, amethyst 82, still well clear of the T73's 72 in quartz. The gap to diamond is the material: an index near 1.55 against 2.417.
DG-Anteros in amethyst · Brilliance 82
DG-Anteros in diamond · Brilliance 95
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: Only DG-M5 Amethyst returns more in amethyst: 85.
For a round amethyst cut on the T73's familiar plan, DG-Anteros is a strong choice: close to DG-M5 for light, with more fire than either DG-M5 or the T73 in quartz.
A cutter who already knows the T73 will find nothing new in the facet sequence; only the angles change. On a first amethyst, that makes it an easy step up from the standard round.
Yes, in our census: Brilliance 82 against 72 for the T73 in amethyst, with 18% leakage against 28%.
DG-Anteros or DG-M5 for amethyst?
DG-M5 returns a little more light (85 against 82); DG-Anteros has a little more fire (54 against 50) and keeps the T73's plan.
Why are this page's cons set against diamond?
Every score counts once, against the baseline it differs from more. Here the gaps to the diamond version are larger than the gaps to the T73, so those are the ones listed.
What does a 6.5 mm DG-Anteros amethyst weigh?
0.73 ct, against 0.97 ct in diamond.
Get the DG-Anteros Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
DG-Anteros Cut 3D files
The DG-Anteros Cut as exact geometry: 73 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.