Brilliance 50 · Fire 48 · Scintillation 81 · in our census, where the T73 scores 96 · 54 · 80 in YAG
How the Peruzzi Cut handles light in YAG, measured: brilliance 50, fire 48 and 48% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the Peruzzi Cut in YAG, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.833. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
Peruzzi Cut YAG
YAG has a refractive index of 1.833 and a dispersion of 0.028. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 33.1°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 36.7° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.833, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.024, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.833, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the Peruzzi Cut in YAG live.
The Peruzzi Cut has 74 facets, a table of 56.8% of its width and a total depth of 69.1% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 46.2°. In YAG, the census returns 50 of 100 for brilliance and 48 for fire, against 96 and 54 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same Peruzzi Cut in diamond reads 75 and 68.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG and with the Peruzzi Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Peruzzi Cut in YAG (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in yag: ahead on 2, behind on 6.
Global64, the comparison 83, difference −19
Brilliance50, the comparison 96, difference −46
Fire48, the comparison 54, difference −6
Scintillation81, the comparison 80, difference +1
Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
Symmetry85, the comparison 100, difference −15
Shape-norm79, the comparison 103, difference −24
Tilt100, the comparison 78, difference +22
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the Peruzzi Cut gains in YAG
Against the T73 in YAG and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the Peruzzi Cut is ahead by the thresholds above. Its figures are in the wheel and the FAQ; YAG ranks every cut we score in YAG.
What the Peruzzi Cut gives up in YAG
Returns less light than the T73 in YAG
Brilliance 50 against 96 for the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG: 46 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In YAG, whose critical angle is 33.1°, the Peruzzi Cut returns 50 of 100 and the T73 96. The Peruzzi Cut's pavilion mains sit at 46.2°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
Peruzzi Cut in YAG · Brilliance 50
T73 Round Brilliant in YAG · Brilliance 96
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 97 for brilliance in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 48 against 4 for the T73 Round Brilliant in YAG: 44 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The Peruzzi Cut leaks 48% in YAG against 4% for the T73 in YAG. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
Peruzzi Cut in YAG · Leakage 48
0° · 48% leak
10° · 44% leak
20° · 30% leak
30° · 30% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in YAG · Leakage 4
0° · 1% leak
10° · 6% leak
20° · 19% leak
30° · 29% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 3% for leakage in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
1.70 ct at 6.5 mm, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (+29%)
Weight follows specific gravity: 4.55 for YAG against 3.52 for diamond, so the same model at the same size weighs 1.70 ct here and 1.32 ct in diamond, 6.5 mm across. Nothing about the light changes with it.
A Peruzzi Cut 6.5 mm across, weighed from the model's measured volume and each stone's specific gravity.
Fire 48 against 68 for the Peruzzi Cut in diamond: 20 points lower
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.024 in YAG) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The Peruzzi Cut reads 48 against 68 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders YAG's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the Peruzzi Cut in YAG under the sunny-day lighting.
What helps:the DG-Elongated Hexagon reads 93 for fire in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Against the T73 in YAG and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the Peruzzi Cut is ahead by our thresholds. The catch: it returns less light than the T73, leaks more light than the T73, weighs more than in diamond and shows less fire than in diamond.
If that catch matters more to you, the DG-M5 reads 97 for brilliance in YAG, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same Peruzzi Cut model we traced.
Peruzzi Cut YAG: questions
Is the Peruzzi a good cut for YAG?
In our census the Peruzzi Cut returns 50 of 100 for brilliance and 48 for fire in YAG, against 96 and 54 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 0 pros and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does YAG need?
At least 36.7° for a round design: YAG's critical angle is 33.1°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The Peruzzi Cut's pavilion mains sit at 46.2°.
How much does a Peruzzi weigh in YAG?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.70 ct in YAG, against 1.32 ct for the same cut in diamond (+29%): YAG's specific gravity is 4.55, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the Peruzzi in YAG in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with YAG's own refractive index and dispersion. YAG is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the Peruzzi Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
Peruzzi Cut 3D files
The Peruzzi Cut as exact geometry: 74 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
Save with a bundle: the Peruzzi Cut 3D and cutting files are also in Historic Cuts Complete, 6 cuts for €29.99 until 1 December, then €39.99 (€101.88 as single files). Buy the bundle.
Not sure the files open in your software? Get the cube free: the same six formats, for your email address, used only to send them (privacy).
