Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the T57 Round Brilliant model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
T57 Round Brilliant Emerald
The T57 is the round brilliant with nothing added: table, 8 stars, 8 bezels, 16 upper halves, 8 pavilion mains and 16 lower halves, meeting at a knife-edge girdle. The mains are cut at 40.75°, and with no girdle band the stone stands just 59.2% from table to point.
We keep it for teaching, comparison and period work, and in emerald it earns its place in the comparison: Brilliance 78, the same as the T73, with 22% leakage, also the same. Every con below is the gap to the same T57 in diamond.
That makes the T57 a clean test of what emerald itself does to a round. The proportions were set for diamond; moved into a stone with a refractive index near 1.58 and a dispersion of 0.014, they lose about a sixth of their light and half their fire, and the losses are the stone's, not the plan's.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald and with the T57 Round Brilliant in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the T57 Round Brilliant in emerald (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in emerald: ahead on 2, level on 3, behind on 3.
Global72, the comparison 73, difference −1
Brilliance78, the comparison 78, difference 0
Fire40, the comparison 39, difference +1
Scintillation72, the comparison 80, difference −8
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm84, the comparison 84, difference 0
Tilt76, the comparison 77, difference −1
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 40 against 79 for the T57 Round Brilliant in diamond: 39 points lower
Fire 40 against 79. Emerald's dispersion, 0.014, is the limit; the cut cannot add colour the stone does not split.
T57 Round Brilliant in emerald · Fire 40
T57 Round Brilliant in diamond · Fire 79
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Leakage 22 against 2 for the T57 Round Brilliant in diamond: 20 points higher
Our census loses 22% through the pavilion, where diamond in the same T57 loses 2%. At 39.4°, emerald's critical angle is far wider than diamond's 24.4°.
T57 Round Brilliant in emerald · Leakage 22
0° · 11% leak
10° · 35% leak
20° · 33% leak
30° · 38% leak
T57 Round Brilliant in diamond · Leakage 2
0° · 4% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 10% leak
30° · 16% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Size changes nothing; the share is fixed by the angles. DG-Anteros Emerald, on the T73's plan with new angles, leaks 14%.
Brilliance 78 against 92 for the T57 Round Brilliant in diamond: 14 points lower
Brilliance 78 against 92: well under the diamond version, and level with the T73 in emerald, so the girdle band changes nothing about light.
T57 Round Brilliant in emerald · Brilliance 78
T57 Round Brilliant in diamond · Brilliance 92
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: Our twelve-fold DG-M5 Emerald returns 90 in emerald.
Tilt 76 against 90 for the T57 Round Brilliant in diamond: 14 points lower
76 of the face-up light is kept at 20°, against 90 for a diamond T57.
T57 Round Brilliant in emerald · Tilt 76
0° · 11% leak
10° · 35% leak
20° · 33% leak
30° · 38% leak
T57 Round Brilliant in diamond · Tilt 90
0° · 4% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 10% leak
30° · 16% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
The T57 suits period work and anyone studying how the round brilliant developed. In emerald it gives up nothing in light to the T73, only sparkle (72 against 80) and the faceted girdle.
For light, yes: Brilliance 78 against 78 for the T73, and the same 22% leakage. It sparkles less, 72 against 80.
Does a T57 emerald have fire?
Little: 40, against 79 for the same cut in diamond.
What does a 6.5 mm T57 emerald weigh?
0.71 ct in our model; a diamond of that width weighs 0.92 ct.
Is a knife-edge girdle a risk in emerald?
A knife edge has no band to take a knock, and emerald, at 7.5 to 8 on the Mohs scale, is softer and more brittle than diamond. A bezel or a protective rim makes sense.
Get the T57 Round Brilliant Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
T57 Round Brilliant Cut 3D files
The T57 Round Brilliant Cut as exact geometry: 57 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.