Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Oval Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Oval Cut Diamond
An oval is a round brilliant pulled out along one axis, facets and all. The oval we measured runs to a ratio of 1.331, 93 facets and a depth of 64.0%, over a 40.99° pavilion.
In diamond it is a cut of extremes. Its fire is second only to DG-Elongated Hexagon among the cuts we measure; its brilliance is about half the T73's. Those two numbers are the story of this page.
Ovals are said to face up larger than a round of the same weight. In our census the oval's spread is 99 against 100 for the T73: level.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Oval Cut in diamond (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in diamond (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in diamond: ahead on 2, level on 1, behind on 5.
Global75, the comparison 90, difference −15
Brilliance47, the comparison 93, difference −46
Fire92, the comparison 78, difference +14
Scintillation87, the comparison 80, difference +7
Spread99, the comparison 100, difference −1
Symmetry98, the comparison 100, difference −2
Shape-norm54, the comparison 100, difference −46
Tilt92, the comparison 92, difference 0
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 92 against 78 for the T73 Round Brilliant in diamond: 14 points higher
Only one cut we measure in diamond shows more. Stretching the plan sets facets at many different angles to the eye, and light leaving them spreads into colour.
Oval Cut in diamond · Fire 92
T73 Round Brilliant in diamond · Fire 78
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Brilliance 47 against 93 for the T73 Round Brilliant in diamond: 46 points lower
The largest brilliance gap on our diamond pages. Along the narrow sides the pavilion meets light at angles that let it through rather than reflect it. Many ovals show this as a dark band across the middle, the bowtie; we do not measure that band.
Oval Cut in diamond · Brilliance 47
T73 Round Brilliant in diamond · Brilliance 93
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Leakage 27 against 2 for the T73 Round Brilliant in diamond: 25 points higher
More than a quarter of the light, 27%, goes out through the oval's pavilion in our census; the T73 lets 2% through. Its 40.99° pavilion figure sits above the 38.9° guide minimum, so a steeper pavilion is not the remedy our data supports.
Oval Cut in diamond · Leakage 27
0° · 31% leak
10° · 31% leak
20° · 32% leak
30° · 35% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in diamond · Leakage 2
0° · 4% leak
10° · 2% leak
20° · 9% leak
30° · 14% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: The share is the same at any size. The Marquise Cut Diamond leaks 17% and keeps an elongated outline; the T73 leaks 2%.
Choose the oval for colour: an elongated diamond with fire near the top of our scale and more sparkle than a round. Accept that it returns about half the light of the T73, and look at the stone face-up for a bowtie before buying.