Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Old Mine Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Old Mine Cut Sapphire
The Old Mine's wide 60.3% table and 44.38° pavilion already leak a third of the light in diamond. Sapphire, with a critical angle near 34.6°, takes that to half.
It is also heavier than diamond for its size, as every sapphire is.
Of the five antique cuts in sapphire, the Old Mine ranks third for light: behind the Old European (78) and the Mazarin (58), ahead of the Peruzzi and the Old Single. Its pavilion, at 44.38°, sits well above sapphire's guide minimum of 36.4°, so the loss comes with the design, and a different design is the remedy the numbers support.
Is sapphire good in an Old Mine cut? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire and with the Old Mine Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Old Mine Cut in sapphire (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: ahead on 2, behind on 6.
Global62, the comparison 79, difference −17
Brilliance50, the comparison 94, difference −44
Fire36, the comparison 37, difference −1
Scintillation81, the comparison 80, difference +1
Spread98, the comparison 100, difference −2
Symmetry90, the comparison 100, difference −10
Shape-norm78, the comparison 102, difference −24
Tilt100, the comparison 75, difference +25
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
No score beats a baseline by our margins. Tilt reads 100 because there is so little light to lose, and scintillation is level with the T73 at 81. The outline is its appeal.
Where the Old Mine falls short in sapphire
Half the T73's light
Brilliance 50 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: 44 points lower
Grey covers the flanks and the ends of the face-up map; colour survives in a cross through the middle.
Old Mine Cut in sapphire · Brilliance 50
T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire · Brilliance 94
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: In sapphire the modern Cushion Cut returns 88.
Leakage 49 against 5 for the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: 44 points higher
Nearly half the light in our census, 49%, leaves through the pavilion; the T73 in sapphire loses 5%.
Old Mine Cut in sapphire · Leakage 49
0° · 50% leak
10° · 46% leak
20° · 37% leak
30° · 37% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire · Leakage 5
0° · 1% leak
10° · 10% leak
20° · 29% leak
30° · 30% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Not by steepening: the mains are at 44.38°, above sapphire's 36.4° guide minimum. The Cushion Cut leaks 11%.
Fire 36 against 72 for the Old Mine Cut in diamond: 36 points lower
Fire 36 against 72 for the same cut in diamond: sapphire's dispersion is under half of diamond's.
Old Mine Cut in sapphire · Fire 36
Old Mine Cut in diamond · Fire 72
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
What helps: The material sets the limit; the Oval Cut reaches 74 in sapphire.