Pear Cut Sapphire: the classic drop shape, short of the round on light
Brilliance 62 · Fire 56 · Scintillation 76 · in our census, where the T73 scores 94 · 37 · 80 in sapphire
Halfway between an oval and a marquise, the pear sits between them in sapphire too: more light than the marquise, less than the oval, and no score that beats a baseline.
Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Pear Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Pear Cut Sapphire
The pear is a brilliant with one rounded end and one point, a classic for pendants and drop earrings. Our model is 1.502 to 1, 64 facets, 60.0% deep, with a 34.93° pavilion figure, a little under sapphire's guide minimum of 36.4°.
In sapphire it beats neither the T73 nor the diamond pear on any score we count. Its fire clears the round and its spread matches it, but neither is enough to count as a pro.
Is a pear cut a good choice for sapphire? Pros and cons
Pros
None by our margins. Its fire beats the T73's, but the diamond pear's by more.
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire and with the Pear Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Pear Cut in sapphire (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: ahead on 2, behind on 6.
Global65, the comparison 79, difference −14
Brilliance62, the comparison 94, difference −32
Fire56, the comparison 37, difference +19
Scintillation76, the comparison 80, difference −4
Spread101, the comparison 100, difference +1
Symmetry85, the comparison 100, difference −15
Shape-norm72, the comparison 102, difference −30
Tilt55, the comparison 75, difference −20
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
We count each score once, against whichever baseline shows the larger gap. Fire, 56, clears the T73's 37 in sapphire, but the pear in diamond reaches 84. Spread is level with the T73, 101 against 100. What it offers is the drop outline, which suits pendants and earrings.
Where the pear falls short in sapphire
A third less light than the T73
Brilliance 62 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: 32 points lower
Brilliance 62 against 94. The diamond pear returns less, 53, so the shape itself is costly.
Pear Cut in sapphire · Brilliance 62
T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire · Brilliance 94
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Fire 56 against 84 for the Pear Cut in diamond: 28 points lower
56 in sapphire against 84: the same facets, under half the dispersion.
Pear Cut in sapphire · Fire 56
Pear Cut in diamond · Fire 84
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Tilt 55 against 80 for the Pear Cut in diamond: 25 points lower
At 20° of tilt it keeps 55 of its face-up light; the diamond pear keeps 80. For a stone that swings in an earring, that is the score to watch.
Pear Cut in sapphire · Tilt 55
0° · 20% leak
10° · 12% leak
20° · 23% leak
30° · 35% leak
Pear Cut in diamond · Tilt 80
0° · 25% leak
10° · 24% leak
20° · 28% leak
30° · 25% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: No drop shape we measure holds much better in sapphire; the Oval Cut Sapphire keeps 58.
Leakage 26 against 5 for the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: 21 points higher
26% in our census, against 5% for the T73 in sapphire and 22% for the pear in diamond.
Pear Cut in sapphire · Leakage 26
0° · 20% leak
10° · 12% leak
20° · 23% leak
30° · 35% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire · Leakage 5
0° · 1% leak
10° · 10% leak
20° · 29% leak
30° · 30% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: The pavilion is under the guide minimum, but we have no measurements of a steeper pear to promise a gain. The Teardrop Cut Sapphire leaks 23%.