Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Marquise Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Marquise Cut Sapphire
Pointed at both ends, the marquise stretches the brilliant plan into a long navette. Our model is 2.059 to 1, with 87 facets and a 31.41° pavilion figure; a marquise 6.5 mm wide weighs 2.38 ct, because it is about twice as long as it is wide.
In sapphire its long facets give it more sparkle than the T73. Everything about light goes the other way: its pavilion figure sits below sapphire's critical angle of 34.6°, and the census finds it leaks nearly eight times as much as the T73.
Is a marquise a good cut for sapphire? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire and with the Marquise Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Marquise Cut in sapphire (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: ahead on 2, level on 1, behind on 5.
Global63, the comparison 79, difference −16
Brilliance55, the comparison 94, difference −39
Fire54, the comparison 37, difference +17
Scintillation86, the comparison 80, difference +6
Spread100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Symmetry94, the comparison 100, difference −6
Shape-norm64, the comparison 102, difference −38
Tilt56, the comparison 75, difference −19
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Count the facets in each crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
Brilliance 55 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: 39 points lower
Brilliance 55 against 94. In diamond the marquise returns 64, so here sapphire takes a further toll.
Marquise Cut in sapphire · Brilliance 55
T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire · Brilliance 94
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps: Among elongated cuts in sapphire, the Oval Cut Sapphire returns 66, with more fire too.
Fire 54 against 89 for the Marquise Cut in diamond: 35 points lower
54 in sapphire, 89 in diamond. It still beats the T73 in sapphire (37), but the larger gap is the one to diamond.
Marquise Cut in sapphire · Fire 54
Marquise Cut in diamond · Fire 89
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
What helps: Fire is the oval's strength in sapphire: the Oval Cut Sapphire scores 74, our highest.
Leakage 39 against 5 for the T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire: 34 points higher
39% in our census, against 5% for the T73 and 17% for the diamond marquise. The pavilion figure, 31.41°, is under sapphire's 36.4° guide minimum.
Marquise Cut in sapphire · Leakage 39
0° · 39% leak
10° · 39% leak
20° · 53% leak
30° · 58% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in sapphire · Leakage 5
0° · 1% leak
10° · 10% leak
20° · 29% leak
30° · 30% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: We have not measured a marquise with a steeper pavilion, so we cannot say what one would recover. The Oval Cut Sapphire, whose pavilion sits above the guide minimum, leaks 26%.
Tilt 56 against 87 for the Marquise Cut in diamond: 31 points lower
Tipped 20°, it keeps 56 of its face-up light against 87 in diamond.
Marquise Cut in sapphire · Tilt 56
0° · 39% leak
10° · 39% leak
20° · 53% leak
30° · 58% leak
Marquise Cut in diamond · Tilt 87
0° · 17% leak
10° · 23% leak
20° · 26% leak
30° · 29% leak
Tilt is how much of its own face-up light a stone keeps when tilted. Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Elongated shapes hold poorly in sapphire; the Oval Cut Sapphire keeps 58.
The marquise suits a sapphire chosen for its long outline, in a design that shows it face-up and protects both points. Sapphire's hardness of 9 resists scratching; the points are still the parts most likely to chip.
Marquise sapphires can also show a darker bow-tie across the middle, which we do not measure.
Marquise Cut Sapphire: questions
Is a marquise cut good for sapphire?
For sparkle, yes (86); for light, no: Brilliance 55 against 94, with 39% leakage.
Marquise or oval for a sapphire?
In sapphire the oval wins on all three: light 66 to 55, fire 74 to 54, leakage 26% to 39%.
What does a 6.5 mm wide marquise sapphire weigh?
About 2.38 ct; the same marquise in diamond is 2.09 ct.
Do marquise sapphires chip?
Its two points are the weak spots in any stone. Sapphire, at 9 on the Mohs scale, resists scratching well, but V-prongs or a bezel at each tip are the usual protection.
Get the Marquise Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
Marquise Cut 3D files
The Marquise Cut as exact geometry: 87 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.