Princess Cut Cubic Zirconia: more fire than a diamond princess
Brilliance 63 · Fire 92 · Scintillation 78 · in our census, where the T73 scores 98 · 87 · 80 in cubic zirconia
Sharp corners and chevron pavilion facets: in CZ the princess throws more colour than the diamond version, and ties the oval for the least light of the jewelry cuts in our CZ top ten.
Rendered in our 3D Gemstone Simulator from the Princess Cut model, 1.00 ct, studio light.
Princess Cut Cubic Zirconia
The princess is a square brilliant with sharp corners and a chevron-patterned pavilion. At 68.5% it is one of the deepest cuts on our CZ pages, over a 41.94° pavilion.
That pavilion is above CZ's guide minimum of 38.1°, yet 22% of the light leaks: the square corners, not a shallow main angle, are the likely reason.
Against the same princess in diamond, CZ comes out ahead on both light and fire. Against the T73 in CZ, the gap in light is the widest of the jewelry cuts in our CZ top ten, level with the oval.
Is a princess cut right for cubic zirconia? Pros and cons
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia and with the Princess Cut in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 2 (Spread) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the Princess Cut in cubic zirconia (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia: ahead on 1, level on 1, behind on 6.
Global79, the comparison 93, difference −14
Brilliance63, the comparison 98, difference −35
Fire92, the comparison 87, difference +5
Scintillation78, the comparison 80, difference −2
Spread95, the comparison 100, difference −5
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm99, the comparison 106, difference −7
Tilt85, the comparison 87, difference −2
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring.
Fire 92 against 83 for the Princess Cut in diamond: 9 points higher
CZ's dispersion, higher than diamond's, puts more colour into the princess's chevron flashes. It beats the T73 in CZ as well, 87.
Princess Cut in cubic zirconia · Fire 92
Princess Cut in diamond · Fire 83
Look at the coloured flashes: those are fire. Same light, same size, same face-up angle; rendered by our 3D Gemstone Simulator from each cut's own model.
Brilliance 63 against 98 for the T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia: 35 points lower
The T73 returns almost everything in CZ; the princess returns under two-thirds of that. In diamond it does worse still, 57.
Princess Cut in cubic zirconia · Brilliance 63
T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia · Brilliance 98
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; grey = light leaving through the pavilion. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
Leakage 22 against 1 for the T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia: 21 points higher
22% leaves through the pavilion in our census, the most of any jewelry cut in our CZ top ten, against 1% for the T73 in CZ.
Princess Cut in cubic zirconia · Leakage 22
0° · 21% leak
10° · 26% leak
20° · 26% leak
30° · 27% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia · Leakage 1
0° · 0% leak
10° · 1% leak
20° · 9% leak
30° · 21% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; grey is light leaving through the pavilion. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps: Steepening is not the answer: the pavilion is already at 41.94°. The Cushion Cut Cubic Zirconia leaks 7%.
Spread 95 against 100 for the T73 Round Brilliant in cubic zirconia: 5 points lower
At 68.5% deep the princess keeps a lot of weight below the girdle, so a stone of a given carat weight is narrower. The outlines at 1 ct show it.
Princess Cut · 4.83 mm at 1.00 ct · Spread 95
T73 Round Brilliant · 5.49 mm at 1.00 ct · Spread 100
Both stones weigh 1.00 ct in cubic zirconia and are drawn to the same scale, from each cut's own model. Spread is face-up size per carat: a deeper stone carries more weight below the girdle and looks smaller for its weight.
Choose the princess in CZ for sharp corners and lots of colour, and accept a stone that is noticeably less bright than a round. Protect the corners, usually with V-prongs.
For fire, yes: 92. For light, it trails: Brilliance 63 against 98 for the T73, with 22% leakage.
Princess or cushion cut in CZ?
The cushion returns more light (88 against 63) and leaks less (7% against 22%); the princess has more fire, 92 against 87.
What does a 6.5 mm princess CZ weigh?
2.44 ct, against 1.48 ct for a diamond princess of the same size.
Why does a princess CZ leak so much light?
In our census 22% leaves through the pavilion. The mains are at 41.94°, above the 38.1° guide minimum, so a shallow main angle is not the cause; the corners are the likely one.
Get the Princess Cut files
6 formatsMillimetresWatertight
Princess Cut 3D files
The Princess Cut as exact geometry: 93 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.