DG-Octagonal Kite Chrysoberyl: what our light census measures
Brilliance 72 · Fire 33 · Scintillation 60 · in our census, where the T73 scores 94 · 29 · 80 in chrysoberyl
How the DG-Octagonal Kite handles light in chrysoberyl, measured: brilliance 72, fire 33 and 27% leakage, set against the T73 in the same stone and against the same cut in diamond.
Light Return map of the DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl, face-up, from our own tracer at refractive index 1.746. Red, green and blue return light to the eye; gray leaks.
DG-Octagonal Kite Chrysoberyl
Chrysoberyl has a refractive index of 1.746 to 1.755 and a dispersion of 0.015. Its critical angle, from the low end of that range, is 34.9°, so a round design needs a pavilion of at least 36.3° for head-on light to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. We trace it with one index, 1.751, the midpoint of the published range, and a fire spread of 0.013, 0.86 of the published dispersion. Every picture here is our Light Return tracer at 1.746, and every figure is from the same light census that scores the other gemstones; the 3D Gemstone Simulator shows the DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl live.
The DG-Octagonal Kite has 41 facets, a table of 55.0% of its width and a total depth of 70.0% of its width; its pavilion mains sit at 43.0°. In chrysoberyl, the census returns 72 of 100 for brilliance and 33 for fire, against 94 and 29 for the T73, our benchmark, in the same stone; the same DG-Octagonal Kite in diamond reads 88 and 82.
Is chrysoberyl good in a DG-Octagonal Kite? Pros and cons, measured
Compared with the T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl and with the DG-Octagonal Kite in diamond.
A difference counts from 3 points (Brilliance, Fire, Tilt, Leakage), 5 (Scintillation,
Symmetry), 4% (face-up size per carat) or 5% (weight); Tilt counts as a pro only for a stone within
5 points of the brilliance it is compared with. How we measure.
All eight scores against the T73
At a glance: the DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl (white) against the T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl (dashed): solid white where
it reaches further, hatched where it falls short. Each pro and con is explained, with pictures, below.
Against the T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl: ahead on 2, level on 1, behind on 5.
Global70, the comparison 77, difference −7
Brilliance72, the comparison 94, difference −22
Fire33, the comparison 29, difference +4
Scintillation60, the comparison 80, difference −20
Spread96, the comparison 100, difference −4
Symmetry100, the comparison 100, difference 0
Shape-norm84, the comparison 101, difference −17
Tilt95, the comparison 75, difference +20
Face-up light census, a different measure from the Cut Grading Tool; Spread and Shape-norm above 100 sit on the ring. Spread is the census's estimate from depth alone; the face-up size in the pros and cons is measured from each model's outline. Open it in the Cut Performance Wheel; these are the same census figures as our Cut Performance Index.
What the DG-Octagonal Kite gains in chrysoberyl
Against the T73 in chrysoberyl and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the DG-Octagonal Kite is ahead by the thresholds above. Its figures are in the wheel and the FAQ; Chrysoberyl ranks every cut we score in chrysoberyl.
What the DG-Octagonal Kite gives up in chrysoberyl
Less fire in chrysoberyl than in diamond
Fire 33 against 82 for the DG-Octagonal Kite in diamond: 49 points lower
Fire is the share of the returned light that splits into color at the exit facet: the census traces each exit again at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread (0.013 in chrysoberyl) and counts a ray as fire when the two directions differ by more than 0.6°. The DG-Octagonal Kite reads 33 against 82 for the same cut in diamond. The figure is the census's; the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders chrysoberyl's fire live.
The fire figure is the census's, traced at the refractive index minus and plus the fire spread. See the fire in the 3D Gemstone Simulator: the DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl under the sunny-day lighting.
What helps:the Oval Cut reads 67 for fire in chrysoberyl, the best of the cuts we score there.
Brilliance 72 against 94 for the T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl: 22 points lower
Brilliance is the share of the 3,200 census rays that enter the stone and come back out of the crown towards the viewer. In chrysoberyl, whose critical angle is 34.9°, the DG-Octagonal Kite returns 72 of 100 and the T73 94. The DG-Octagonal Kite's pavilion mains sit at 43.0°, the T73's at 40.8°. The maps below show where each stone's light returns from and where it leaks.
DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl · Brilliance 72
T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl · Brilliance 94
Red, green and blue = light returning to the eye; gray = leakage, light that leaves heading down or stays inside. This is the head-on view; the Brilliance score averages a wider cone of light, so the score can differ from what one picture shows.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 100 for brilliance in chrysoberyl, the best of the cuts we score there.
Leakage 27 against 5 for the T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl: 22 points higher
Leakage is the share of the census rays that enter the stone and leave through the pavilion, or through the crown heading down. The DG-Octagonal Kite leaks 27% in chrysoberyl against 5% for the T73 in chrysoberyl. Grey in the maps below is leaking light; the share under each picture is that picture's own.
DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl · Leakage 27
0° · 27% leak
10° · 27% leak
20° · 29% leak
30° · 38% leak
T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl · Leakage 5
0° · 1% leak
10° · 11% leak
20° · 28% leak
30° · 30% leak
Each frame is the Light Return map with the stone tilted away from you by the angle shown; gray is leakage. The share under each frame is that picture's own.
What helps:the DG-M5 reads 0% for leakage in chrysoberyl, the best of the cuts we score there.
Scintillation 60 against 80 for the T73 Round Brilliant in chrysoberyl: 20 points lower
Scintillation follows the number of facets the stone shows: 100 × (1 − e^(−facets / 45)). The DG-Octagonal Kite has 41 facets and the T73 73, so 60 against 80. It depends on the geometry alone, so it is the same in every stone.
Scintillation follows the number of facets: more facets, more and smaller flashes as the stone moves. Compare the facet counts under the drawings; each drawing shows only the crown. Drawn from each cut's own model.
What helps:the DG-Miliano reads 98 for scintillation in chrysoberyl, the best of the cuts we score there.
Our verdict on the DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl
Against the T73 in chrysoberyl and the same cut in diamond, no figure of the DG-Octagonal Kite is ahead by our thresholds. The catch: it shows less fire than in diamond, returns less light than the T73, leaks more light than the T73 and has fewer facets to sparkle with.
If that catch matters more to you, the Oval Cut reads 67 for fire in chrysoberyl, the best of the cuts we score there.
Every figure on this page is from our light census, traced at one refractive index: a simulation of the geometry, not a grading report. The 3D files and cutting files below are the same DG-Octagonal Kite model we traced.
DG-Octagonal Kite Chrysoberyl: questions
Is the DG-Octagonal Kite a good cut for chrysoberyl?
In our census the DG-Octagonal Kite returns 72 of 100 for brilliance and 33 for fire in chrysoberyl, against 94 and 29 for the T73 in the same stone. Against that round and against the same cut in diamond it has 0 pros and 4 cons by our thresholds; the summary above names them.
What pavilion angle does chrysoberyl need?
At least 36.3° for a round design: chrysoberyl's critical angle is 34.9°, from the low end of its refractive index range, and head-on light has to reflect off both sides of the pavilion and leave through the table. The DG-Octagonal Kite's pavilion mains sit at 43.0°.
How much does a DG-Octagonal Kite weigh in chrysoberyl?
At 6.5 mm across, 1.32 ct in chrysoberyl, against 1.25 ct for the same cut in diamond (+6%): chrysoberyl's specific gravity is 3.73, diamond's 3.52.
Can I see the DG-Octagonal Kite in chrysoberyl in 3D?
Yes: the 3D Gemstone Simulator renders it live, with chrysoberyl's own refractive index and dispersion. Chrysoberyl is traced by the same light census as the other gemstones, with its refractive index and fire spread derived from published values, so its scores are on the same scale; the pictures here are our Light Return tracer, and the Cut Performance Wheel sets it against any other cut and stone.
Get the DG-Octagonal Kite Cut files
6 formatsMillimetersWatertight
DG-Octagonal Kite Cut 3D files
The DG-Octagonal Kite Cut as exact geometry: 41 planar facets, real-world scale, ready for CAD,
rendering, printing and casting.
