Diamond anatomy and proportions · 4 min read

Diamond measurements explained: diameter, depth and percentages

A round diamond's measurements read minimum diameter – maximum diameter × depth, in millimeters. Every other proportion is an angle or a percentage of the average diameter, and the total depth is the crown height + the girdle + the pavilion depth.

Two lines, one secret

Two grading reports, both for a 1.00 ct round diamond. The measurements read:

You cannot see either stone. Which one faces up bigger, and which one hides weight where you can't see it?

Divide the depth by the diameter. Stone 1 is 61.7% deep. Stone 2 is about 67.5% deep. (The simulator's report uses unrounded figures and says 67.6%.) That stone is narrower and taller, so the same carat sits lower down, out of sight. Those two lines are the T73 in our simulator at Excellent and at Poor cut. This page shows you how to read a report the same way.

The two 1.00 ct stones side on, at true size.
The two 1.00 ct stones side on, at true size.

Everything is a share of the diameter

On a report, the size of a round diamond is written as minimum diameter – maximum diameter × depth, in millimeters. (Fancy shapes give length × width × depth.) No round is perfectly round. So the lab measures the narrowest and the widest diameter across the girdle. Their average is the yardstick for all the other numbers. A big gap between the two shows that the stone is out of round.

Every other proportion is an angle, in degrees, or a percentage of that average diameter:

With percentages, you can compare stones of any size: a 0.5 ct and a 5 ct with the same proportions read the same numbers. The habit is old. In 1919, Tolkowsky calculated his ideal round. He set the diameter at 100 units. He gave the table as 53.0, the part above the girdle as 16.2 and the part below as 43.1.

The lab measures all this with an optical device that never touches the stone. The report draws the result as a proportion diagram: the profile of the stone, with its numbers.

Three heights make the depth

Look at a diamond side on. The total depth has three stacked parts:

crown height + girdle + pavilion depth = total depth

Two of those parts come from the angles. The crown height depends on the crown angle and on the width of the crown's ring (the table takes the rest). The pavilion depth depends on the pavilion angle only.

Here are the numbers in our Cut Grading Tool:

The T73 side on, its crown height, girdle and pavilion depth stacked into the total depth.
The T73 side on, its crown height, girdle and pavilion depth stacked into the total depth.

Two small details explain why the sums are never exact. The tool's profile rounds the crown height and the pavilion depth to the nearest half percent. Also, its depth formula subtracts a small calibration (0.25%). We measured the T73's own 3D model directly: it is 61.7% deep.

The girdle is the one height with no angle. That makes it a quiet way to add depth, and weight.

Try it yourself

  1. Open Cut Grading Tool. It starts on the T73 as cut. Look at the Profile view. Read the crown height, the girdle, the pavilion depth and the total depth.
  2. Open More proportions and raise Girdle thickness from 2.5% to 7.5%. Which numbers in the profile move, and which stay the same? Watch the grade.
  3. Put the girdle back and change the Crown angle. Which numbers move now?
  4. Report detective. Calculate the total depth of these three made-up 1.00 ct rounds. Which one do you look at first?
    • A: 6.48 – 6.52 × 4.00 mm
    • B: 6.20 – 6.22 × 4.18 mm
    • C: 6.40 – 6.60 × 3.95 mm

What the Cut Grading Tool shows

The girdle moves only the total. From 2.5% to 7.5%, the crown height (about 16.0%) and the pavilion depth (about 43.0%) do not change. But the total depth climbs from 61.6% to 66.6%, and the grade falls from Excellent to Fair. The tool tells you why. The total depth is past even the Good limit (66.5%), so the stone has a lot of extra weight for its diameter.

The crown angle moves the crown height. A steeper crown gives a taller crown, and the total depth follows. The pavilion does not change.

Report detective. A is 6.50 mm on average and 61.5% deep. B is 6.21 mm and 67.3% deep: narrow and deep, so B hides weight. C is 6.50 mm and 60.8% deep, but look at the diameters: 6.40 against 6.60, a 0.20 mm gap. C is out of round, and that gap needs a closer look.

Key points

Go further: the T73 cut page gives the model's own measurements: 8.15 × 8.15 × 5.03 mm, 61.7% deep.

Try it free

Free, in your browser, no account.

Quick quiz

Five questions on this lesson, a couple of minutes. Pick an answer and see at once if you got it, and why.

Take the quiz

Cuts in this lesson

We sell the files of these cuts: 3D models and cutting files, with a personal-use license.

Keep exploring

· Diamond anatomy and proportions: all lessons · All topics